tlhIngan Hol vIghojtaH!

  • bionicjoey@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    2 years ago

    “Courses” is a strong word for what Duolingo offers. It just shows you flashcards, but never explains grammar/syntax rules. Lingodeer is far superior.

    • Akuchimoya@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Duolingo does have that function. It’s much more obvious on desktop web, but in the phone app, you tap the notebook icons to the right of the headings. I mean, they’re not necessarily excellent explanations, but they’re there.

    • lugal@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      The old tree had grammar bits (for some languages only in the browser) but the new one is just bad

    • zerofk@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      The problem with all these alternatives is that the language selection is extremely limited. You want to learn English, French, German, or Spanish? Great, there are a million options for you! But if you go a bit more niche like Finnish or Irish, your options are much more limited. Of course there are ways to learn those languages - and much better ways than Duolingo. But Duolingo’s strength is offering a bunch of them, for free, in one place.

      Note that I’m not trying to defend Duolingo, but rather deploring the lack of alternatives.

    • stinerman@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      I use Duolingo (and actually pay for it) and I agree 100% with this. The app is primarily about keeping you engaged and on the app. The method is by attempting to teach you a language.