Since my polymorph meme has only garnered three downvotes so far I thought I’d offer a bit more controversial take, and see if I can manage to stir the pot a bit with this one.

  • MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s flavour text.

    The touch of your shadow-wreathed hand can siphon life force from others to heal your wounds. Make a melee spell attack against a creature within your reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d6 necrotic damage, and you regain hit points equal to half the amount of necrotic damage dealt. Until the spell ends, you can make the attack again on each of your turns as an action.

    You are, in fact, a creature within your reach.

        • Royal_Bitch_Pudding@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          The mere act of including “from others” is all the proof required.

          If Self was valid for the Siphon effect they wouldn’t have had to mention it at all, since Self is automatically included as a valid target unless otherwise stated.

          • Cereal Nommer@ttrpg.networkOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            I think that’s kind of a stretch. The range of the spell is explicitly “Self”, and the heal triggers off a hit dealing damage to the target.

            If this kind of cherry-picking clauses worked, the Paladin “Breaking your Oath” sidebar would be meaningless. All an impenitent Paladin player needs to do is point to the first sentence of the Sacred Oath feature that says “[…] you swear the oath that binds you as a paladin forever.”

            Also the fact that a redundant statement is included is not proof of anything. I’ve fielded similar arguments with someone who thought the “Casting the spell doesn’t remove it from your list of prepared spells.” clause in the Spellcasting feature of prepared casters was proof that all other methods of spellcaster deleted the spell after it was cast. Trying to explain that “A spell is a discrete magical effect, a single shaping of the magical energies” is not the same as one-time use only, the same way a sword being a discrete object doesn’t mean swinging the sword is a one time thing, is exhausting.

          • Khanzarate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            If we’re going strict RAW, the “from others” clause only affects life force, not HP. Spells don’t do more than what they say, after all. So you can take HP from others, but not life force.

        • Kryomaani@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          And it doesn’t say “you cannot fly”, yet it doesn’t make you capable of flying. This means nothing: The spell does only what it says it does and it quite clearly says “you can siphon life force from others”.

          • seth@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            If it were quite clear to ignore some text over other text when there might be interactions, OP’s funny post wouldn’t exist. I’m glad to have game groups with DMs who shy away from pedantry and bend/break rules when it improves the fun and adventure of the party experience.