• 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Declaring people to have a certain value relative to each other strikes me as uncomfortably close to treating people as things.

    • dualistic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I don’t understand why only things can have different values. People have different impact on the environment, the world, etc. and what you value determines their worth on that scale. If everything is equally important to you, good or evil, then i guess everything and everyone can have the same value? I don’t really understand this paradigm.

      • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I want to point out a stronger contention in your favor: Republicans in the US are murdering their own citizens right now. I don’t think they are demonstrating much worth at the moment.

        • Instigate@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 hours ago

          More fuel to add to the fire - compare a factory worker with a capitalist. The capitalist provides negative value to society, by actively stripping the value of others’ labour from them while contributing nothing themselves, whereas the factory worker creates value for those around them. I’d argue that the factory worker has more value than the capitalist.