Fourth-ranking Republican cries ethics when judge calls out the risk of authoritarianism and fact denialism.

  • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    10 months ago

    “Judge Howell’s partisan speech is obviously highly inappropriate election interference by a federal judge that undermines the public’s trust in our courts,” Stefanik wrote.

    Ye gads, how can anyone read this and not laugh out loud at the truly monumental levels of hypocrisy? This judge’s speech is undermining trust in the courts? Really? This speech, not the millions, if not billions of dollars in bribes taken by members of the SCOTUS?

    • Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m just so tired of the political theatre. I can’t imagine how this is exciting to anyone on the right, because even if the speech was wholly partisan (and it very much wasn’t), it is a clear-cut case of someone exercising their right to free speech at a dinner where people give speeches. Howell wasn’t acting in any capacity as a judge.

      Like, Lisa is about as “invigorating” as Ron DeSantis or James Comer, so I don’t really understand her angle on this. It’s baffling.