I ‘think’ there’s a more innocent interpretation in there of something like, “If you’re going to do Nazis right now, it might be worth making them more than a cliche villain to spray lead at so people can see how intrusive and insidious the ideology is.”
buuuuut “we don’t need more anti-nazi slop shoved down our throats” is one hell of a way to say that xP
“balanced and unbiased take on WWII” after calling something “anti-nazi slop” is hard to even call a dog whistle, it’s more like a fog horn.
Whistling is so last decade for conservatives and the rest of the right
I ‘think’ there’s a more innocent interpretation in there of something like, “If you’re going to do Nazis right now, it might be worth making them more than a cliche villain to spray lead at so people can see how intrusive and insidious the ideology is.”
buuuuut “we don’t need more anti-nazi slop shoved down our throats” is one hell of a way to say that xP
Yeah, mostly because that’s not at all what he was trying to say with that sentiment.
Never attribute to malice that which can be attributed to stupidity.
Except for Nazis: it’s all malice.
But how do you cross that Nazi threshhold without false positives?
If you complain that anti-nazi media is biased, you’ve passed it.