I don’t really know how to say this without being a dick, but where is the reading comprehension!?

The meeting you’re referring to was the organizer offering to meet with her after she had been removed from the original function, and he said she may wear whatever shirt she likes.

Obviously she is not a conservative woman having her face eaten, the shirt itself should be enough evidence of that. Unless I’m way off the Canadian conservative base.

And you’re call out confirmation bias? It’s like you’re looking for a bad guy and can’t pick a target.

Again, I’m sorry, but we both read the article (allegedly), and I didn’t have any trouble understanding the situation. Woman wears LGBTQ friendly shirt to a town hall meeting. She is asked to leave. After leaving, probably a few days, she is in contact with the event organizer who is offering to meet her for coffee, in whatever shirt she likes, to discuss her concerns and address any questions she would have liked to raise at the previous meeting, the one she was removed from.