Might only be comparing equal screen sizes, which would mean the better TVs of the 2000s are being compared to what are basically computer monitors today. And yeah, the cost of those now is negligible compared to an actual common mid-sized (let alone large) TV of today.
Might only be comparing equal screen sizes, which would mean the better TVs of the 2000s are being compared to what are basically computer monitors today. And yeah, the cost of those now is negligible compared to an actual common mid-sized (let alone large) TV of today.
Even small tvs are not $6. Math is off.
But good luck finding any TV for 300 bucks in 2000. TVs were expensive back then.