More resignations of federal prosecutors are expected at the US Attorney’s Office in Minnesota amid ongoing frustration over the Trump administration’s response to the fatal shooting of Renée Good by an ICE officer in Minneapolis.

“I have heard there may be more people leaving, people I would consider senior and respected career prosecutors,” said Anders Folk, a former acting US attorney in Minnesota, who left the office in 2021 to work for the Justice Department in Washington, DC, under former President Biden.

Minnesota Federal Defender Katherian Roe, in a staffwide email obtained by the Sahan Journal, also wrote that “more resignations are anticipated” at the US Attorney’s Office. “It’s a sign that something is not right” there, added Folk, who is still in touch with colleagues in the office and is now running for Hennepin County Attorney.

Already this week, at least five federal prosecutors in Minnesota announced their resignations. Among them was the office’s second-in-command, Joseph Thompson, who was overseeing the welfare fraud investigation involving Somali immigrants that President Trump used as a pretext to send his immigration force to Minneapolis.

  • theMacerena@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I wish they would ‘quiet quit’ instead of resign, do the worst job imaginable and whenever possible help out people who need it. Resigning let’s them fill the spot with sycophants.

    • njm1314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Yeah I’ve heard this said a lot but it just doesn’t line up with reality. The truth of the matter is people who stay in the fascist regimes tend to just perpetuate the fascist regimes. They keep the wheels moving. Even pretending that you’re helping, which statistically you’re not, is still keeping things running. Your presence is lending legitimacy and competency to an organization that without you would lack both. There’s got to be a line in the sand for people and frankly I think the line should be Nazis.

      Also want to point out that the sycophants tend to actually gum up the works. They don’t know what they’re doing they do a bad job and thus it’s easier to fight against them. They’re easier to dismiss out of hand, and to invalidate everything they do due to their illegal appointments.

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        The US Military “Simple Sabotage” handbook literally says that if you can’t overtly sabotage things (like attacking supply lines, bombing factories, etc.), then you should try to covertly sabotage things by getting a job in middle management. Then just do your very best to embody the phrase “middle manglement”.

        Demand unreasonable deadlines from other departments, to force them to drop what they’re doing and focus on your stuff. Fail to forward things where they need to go. Miss your own department’s deadlines, so their projects are delayed. Fire too many employees, or “encourage” them to quit. Fail to hire employees to fill vacancies. Implement tons of repetitive busywork to force employees to spend extra time on projects. Make sure vendors don’t get paid on time. Etc, etc… Basically, do everything you can to gum up the works.

        • BanMe@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It says to encourage people in these jobs to think in reverse and do a shit job, it doesn’t say to take a job for the purposes of doing a shit job. You’re supposed to find people already employed, use a sense of humor, encourage them to fuck off and be careless, do the opposite of what’s told. The subjects are people who aren’t going to quit their jobs because they can’t. They have families depending on them, they may be employed in compulsory positions, like required military service.

          In any case it was written about mechanics and guards, not career civil rights attorneys, a different beast entirely.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s nice that they have that theory. The problem is there’s no evidence that’s ever worked. On the other hand the US military has helped to prop up and put in power multiple fascist regimes. So I’m not sure where they’re coming from with that one. Now if they were saying bomb them out of existence yeah that the US military is a great fucking source of information. So it seems to me that you should try that one.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          10 hours ago

          That’s a fair point. If we get to the point where people are literally being shoved into ovens yeah try to gum up the works from the inside. However before we get there I think you’re better off trying to stop them from the outside. Cuz you’ll notice Schindler being on the inside didn’t stop them from getting to the oven part. Nor did all the other cogs in the wheels stop them from getting to that point. In fact that wheel turned pretty fast. So I don’t know why we should keep the wheel turning.

        • njm1314@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          First of all let’s go ahead and disabuse you of the notion that whistleblowing against corrupt corporations is the same as standing up to fascism. That’s an absurd comparison.

          What more proof do I need than the entire history of fascism? Where are these examples of fascism being brought down by internal destruction? In the history of fascism if it’s not brought down by an external War then it lasts for decades. So I think the track record for your hypothesis is rather poor. Shouldn’t you be the one providing proof? Proving that resisting fascism from within works?

          The sad truth is that during fascist regimes a lot of people work for the fascist because it’s easy. They’re just cogs in the wheel. And staying a cog helps the wheel turn.

          The CIA isnt protecting you from fascism. They are directly responsible for its continued existence.

        • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Lol. The CIA guide to sabotaging fascism. The CIA. The organization that has aided and preserved fascism more than any other organization probably. Maybe MI6 deserves an honorable mention. There’s a source I trust. Wow.

          I really hope you’re being mocked mercilessly every time you post that.

          • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            You should at least get your damn info correct. There are plenty of ways to critique it without demonstrating that you havent even read the damned cover. It was written by the office of strategic services, which was the precursor to the CIA. It was written for distribution to citizens within axis countries — you know, the fascist ones?!— to give them ideas for how to safely sabotage their own governments and industries. At least read the damn year, you loon.

            • Sharkticon@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              9 hours ago

              Lol. I don’t know where you got the idea that I didn’t read the damn thing. That’s partly why making fun of it so much. Cuz the oss, who had a history of helping Nazis flee justice so I don’t know why you’re invoking them like there’s some kind of Paragons, was founded in 1942. We were already at War for 3 years. They weren’t dropping this in 1933 to the bureaucrats were they? So explain to me again how this proves sticking around and working for Nazis helps? This manual endorsed by organizations that have never ended a fascist regime.

              What are you people even talking about?

              " I’m going to change the police department from the inside."

              " I’m going to change the prison industry from the inside."

              " I’m going to change the Nazi party from the inside."

              Lmao

              • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                7 hours ago
                1. if you’re talking about the US, then “we” were definitively not at war with the Nazis for three years at that point, nor had the OSS done anything paperclip-related at that point. You might need to get the part of your brain responsible for subtraction checked, because the united states went to war with Germany and Italy on December 11th, 1941. The OSS was founded 6 months afterward. This manual was created 2 years and 1 month after the US entered the war. Operation Paperclip would be put into effect about a year and a half later, when the US realised it was actually pushing into Germany, and there were a bunch of scientists with loose morals who could see which way the wind was blowing, and who were happy to tell them in which random mine shaft they hid all their rocketry research.

                2. I actually tend to agree that the time for changing things from the inside has passed. I’m just annoyed at your apparent inability to comprehend numbers and their significance. Also, your refusal to even acknowledge that the whole purpose of the OSS at its inception was to infiltrate and fight the fascists. It’s not some “Paragon”, it’s just what they were tasked with, and they did it.

                3. the idea that the US Government had nothing to do with the end of a fascist regime after this thing was published is laughable, but I suppose it makes sense if you can’t get your years straight. That must be very confusing for you.

                4. as I said, there are so many ways that you can critique this thing that don’t involve a fundamental misunderstanding of the operational goal of the US government during WWII. There are MANY problems with it, and it shows a fundamental lack of care for the safety of the saboteurs, since they were just random non-US citizens, and let nobody claim that the US government has ever given a fuck about the lives of individuals.

    • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not particularly possible because to this administration if you are not contributing to the illegal BS your not doing your job right and must be fired

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        60
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m a big fan of “fuck quitting, make them fire you” and collecting a paycheck while doing basically nothing until they actually do it themselves. I’m not making their job easier when they deserve to get fucked over.

        • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          It’s the Trump administration. The second you not do as ordered you get the boot.

          Being hyperbolic I grant you but point is getting rid of opposition within the Executive Branch is rather easy for the administration to do

          • Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Just say you are and drag your feet. Take SL randomly, make all sorts of errors that will cause paperwork and court filings to have to be redone. Just play idiot until they eventually fire you.

            • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              Only to get fired anyways because during said follow up they will see you didn’t do as told.

              If the email is an attempt to whistle blow that’s the Fed Raid I mentioned already.

              And also seriously you’re going to use a fucking CIA Article?

              • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                9 hours ago

                That document was created before the CIA existed, for use during WWII. It was written to encourage citizens under fascist regimes to work against their government and industries.

                If you would prefer, it’s hosted on Project Gutenberg. Just search “simple sabotage”

                • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  9 hours ago

                  It’s still a link to the CIA website. Not saying the information in question is Bull, just the source is bull

                  • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    7 hours ago

                    Oh, totally fair, i kind of figured that was your concern. Just telling you where to find it. Also, giving an explanation as to why the CIA is being cited, and why it is actually much more reasonable than trying to take anything the modern CIA would produce at face value.

                    That being said, the document demonstrates an almost farcical lack of care for the safety of the saboteur, giving many suggestions which surely, even at that time, must have been near-guaranteed to lead to capture of the saboteur.

        • forrgott@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Well, it’s all about the politics.

          In other words, reality is irrelevant. All that matters is the messaging. If you resign, you get to start all the political bullshit on message. If you are fired, whoever fired you sets the stage instead.

          Career politicians are a cancer on society. And if they cared about achievements or legacy, they would absolutely not be successful in making politics their career.

      • Signtist@bookwyr.me
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Well, you’d at least be able to do one good thing from the inside to earn that “not contributing” badge of honor before you leave. Better than leaving without it.

        • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          I would argue you are receiving it anyways. Like I said it’s the Trump Administration. There is no “quiet quitting.” IE only do the bare minimum.

          You either do something that helps implement the President’s Directive or you leave.

          • Signtist@bookwyr.me
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            What I mean is that you’re already on the inside, an opportunity a lot of people would love to have. Even if all you do is call one person to warn them they’re being watched before putting in your resignation, it’s better than quitting without doing that.

            I work for a normal company, but even I’d be able to do a lot of damage in a couple hours if I really wanted to screw over my employer before leaving. Information is a big part of any conflict; even just sending whatever sensitive information you happen to have on hand to some interested parties can really throw a wrench in the works.

            • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              But see that’s just it. You’re thinking this from the perspective of a normal company. Sure Quiet Quit and work slow downs can work in a normal company but because there is mechanisms and laws that makes firing just from disobedience not so simple.

              In the Trump ruled Executive Branch, there is no such protections or loopholes. It’s obey or fired, no wait till the paperwork is all in order.

              • Signtist@bookwyr.me
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                That’s why I mentioned damage done in a couple hours - you’re not going to be fired until you do the thing you’re being fired over. It’s not like they automatically know when someone is planning to do something they’re going to be fired over; even if they somehow immediately knew you were up to something, you could probably at least attach some sensitive documents to one email before they grab you and throw you out of the building.

                • green_red_black@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  There is no “damage in a couple hours.” You don’t contribute your sent home immediately and pack your bags.

                  Actually they would, be rather suspicious of you doing anything that isn’t leaving the office when you got fired for not backing the presidents policy.

                  And that email is flagged and you have the Feds breaking into your house and the property of who you emailed (WSJ Raid literal example.).

                  • Signtist@bookwyr.me
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 day ago

                    Bud, what? We’re talking about people who were working day after day without being fired who suddenly had enough and decided to leave. They weren’t in imminent danger of being fired prior to their resignation. So, the morning when they come in to turn in their (unexpected!) resignation, they do what they can to fuck things up a bit beforehand. Yeah, you’re right that the government could go after them for it if they weren’t smart enough to cover their tracks, but let’s be honest - the current government will likely go after them for leaving regardless.