• lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 day ago

    I’m saying there’s no value in adding doomer loser noise to the signal.

    Adding a positive is positive, reducing a negative is also a positive. I’m reducing a negative by asking these helpless bleating losers to be less unhelpful and vocal.

    I’m happy and open to having a positive and constructive conversation, but they don’t start with rude challenges

    • DagwoodIII@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 day ago

      Still not providing an actual plan.

      When you get one, post it.

      And I consider phrases like ‘doomer loser’ pretty rude.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Adding a positive is positive, reducing a negative is also a positive. I’m reducing a negative by asking these helpless bleating losers to be less unhelpful and vocal.

      Lol, telling someone who is claiming the solution is to convince people to vote a loser is positive?

      I mean that’s just the truth… You can’t make changes to the organization of the executive branch without securing the support of both the executive and Congress.

      Maybe instead of loosing your shit about people being looser doomers, you might just want to read a book about civics.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          You’re commenting on an edit

          Do you not stand by your edit, what’s the problem here?

          I can excuse your tone

          You just can’t muster a rebuttal?

          late to the party

          Lol, now that’s some weak loser shit. Why even respond if you don’t have anything to say that actually defends your claims?