• Skullgrid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    makes sense, more or less. I guessed northern line when I saw the title, and I was right. That thing is huge with its 6 branches and various combinations.

    not sure how it will increase passenger flow since the same stations will have the same changeover bottlenecks and etc

    • guy_threepwood@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      More trains = more passengers and more passengers = more passenger ”flow” even if it isn’t the same passengers flowing I guess.

      But yes, it makes sense…although without significant changes st Camden Town it won’t be plessnt for people who will need to interchange there

      • Skullgrid@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        More trains = more passengers and more passengers = more passenger ”flow” even if it isn’t the same passengers flowing I guess.

        ok, but how will changing the name of the lines/having them be under different management change how many trains go by? Can’t they just make more trains go by now anyway? what would be different that they can’t do now? (I think I just asked the same question 3 different ways. More trains how?)