• mjr@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    instead of recognizing them as a safe, sustainable alternative to cars, the bill reclassifies them as ​“motorized bicycles” and imposes requirements usually reserved for motor vehicles. If signed into law, NJ would require operators of low-speed e-bikes to hold a driver’s license, register their bikes with the Motor Vehicle Commission (MVC), and carry insurance.

    That’s just wild. As in: the legislators seem to have gone feral. Does anyone know their reasons, or does the mention of “lame duck” imply it slipped through something like the “washing up” at the end of a Westminster session, with the parties doing deals about what to pass unchallenged?

    • _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.worksOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Gotta wonder what their motives to push for this are. How many of them have ties to the automotive industry? Energy industry?

    • GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      As a person who hates Electric Bikes, I am for this.

      I watch them speed by, way too close most times, while I bicycle on safe areas (especially, Bicycle <ONLY & NO MOTORIZED VEHICLES> Paths). All (slow-fast) Electric Bikes have been needing serious regulating from the beginning.
      The only thing I dislike about this regulating aspect is it seems to only regulate low speed Electric Bikes.