My favorite part is where they continue to argue with my banned ass, knowing full well I can’t respond. The only way to win for them, I suppose.
Edit: Looks like there was some confusion regarding cross-posting in the original link so I’ll just put the Modlog link here that displays the removed comment and ban, with the thread itself linked here. I’d rather add than change for the sake of the post’s integrity and preventing confusion.
I have no idea because you chose to be vague instead of making specific claims about which country and leader China supported. Please stop making every sentence a rhetorical question, just say what you mean directly. Regardless, as I said, it’s not relevant. See the quoted paragraph below from my previous reply.
If you're going to reply to this, please actually address the points I originally brought up (copied inside the spoiler) instead of dodging them.
Yes, you’re correct that if there was an overwhelming amount of credible evidence from an almost uncountable number of sources (including the people committing genocide bragging about it) it would be different.
There’s no equivalence there. Treating these two things as equivalent minimizes (possibly even rises to the level of denying) the actual genocide.
Even if we accept whatever you’re trying to say here completely at face value, is your stance that someone who says “this specific claim about China is not supported by credible evidence” has to then answer for every single thing any leader in any country ever supported in any way by China has said?
Are you sure you know what a rhetorical question is?
Are you sure you know what a discussion is?
Do you believe I’m not treating you with the seriousness you deserve?
I believe I don’t know why you even bothered to participate in this discussion if this was what you were going to do.
Removed by mod
@[email protected] you guys gonna ban this person for trolling or is it only against the rules when a communist does it?
Ban them for blatant ableism, too. The trolling was already ableist (deliberately communicating in a way intended to cause confusion, disproportionately affecting ND users but of course also incredibly shitty to NT users), but the comment you’re replying to made it blatant.
Ban this user for blatant ableism as well, or is it only an issue when a non-ml does it?
Sounds like I treated you worse than the Chinese treat the Uyghurs.
Oh wait, you said that never happened, so that means I didn’t? Or I did?
Now I’m confused.
This must be because I’m bisexual and you’re confusing me on purpose. Sounds like a blatant homophobic attack.
Is that how this works?
Pretend to be a victim, shortly after making excuses for authoritarian capitalist regimes committing crimes against humanity?
Avoid answering a question about authoritarians who quote fascists, because you want to keep lying to yourself that you’re a communist, then pretend people who are ND are unable to answer questions?
But hey, the billionaire authoritarian capitalists you’re defending thank you for your services to communism LeninWeave.
Not content with deliberately communicating in a confusing and hostile manner and refusing to clarify or stop when asked, you’ve now progressed to overt ableism in using “not very bright” as an insult and implying someone not understanding your deliberately incomprehensible method of communication is “not very bright”.