My favorite part is where they continue to argue with my banned ass, knowing full well I can’t respond. The only way to win for them, I suppose.
Edit: Looks like there was some confusion regarding cross-posting in the original link so I’ll just put the Modlog link here that displays the removed comment and ban, with the thread itself linked here. I’d rather add than change for the sake of the post’s integrity and preventing confusion.
Do you believe I’m not treating you with the seriousness you deserve?
I believe I don’t know why you even bothered to participate in this discussion if this was what you were going to do.
Removed by mod
@[email protected] you guys gonna ban this person for trolling or is it only against the rules when a communist does it?
Ban them for blatant ableism, too. The trolling was already ableist (deliberately communicating in a way intended to cause confusion, disproportionately affecting ND users but of course also incredibly shitty to NT users), but the comment you’re replying to made it blatant.
Ban this user for blatant ableism as well, or is it only an issue when a non-ml does it?
I have to police the entire thread for any kind of ableism, including comments made after I made that comment and not in response to me, and I have to spend my limited energy to call out every single person I see, otherwise I’m faking caring? Do I understand your point correctly?
You two have to not be hypocrites, the other comment was removed by dbzer0 yet .ml’s ableism is allowed to stay.
You lot are always trying to act like you’re the most moral instance in the world, when it’s obviously a load of crap and you’re no better than anywhere else.
Please actually address my questions if you’re going to reply. Am I expected to personally police all ableism in the thread even if it’s after I stop participating or not in response to me to be taken seriously when I call out ableism?
Since we’re on a dbzer0 comm, shouldn’t you be asking the dbzer0 admins who moderate it about this?
Sounds like I treated you worse than the Chinese treat the Uyghurs.
Oh wait, you said that never happened, so that means I didn’t? Or I did?
Now I’m confused.
This must be because I’m bisexual and you’re confusing me on purpose. Sounds like a blatant homophobic attack.
Is that how this works?
Pretend to be a victim, shortly after making excuses for authoritarian capitalist regimes committing crimes against humanity?
Avoid answering a question about authoritarians who quote fascists, because you want to keep lying to yourself that you’re a communist, then pretend people who are ND are unable to answer questions?
But hey, the billionaire authoritarian capitalists you’re defending thank you for your services to communism LeninWeave.
I think the problem is the billionaire oligarchs who run authoritarian capitalist states which commit human rights abuses on unimaginable scales, and the people who make excuses for them.
But I understand that being left-wing functions differently in the special world of .ml and hexbear. So no wonder you find actually left-wing views problematic.
If you want I can ask you a question about gay rights in China and Russia, so you can avoid answering it and use it as an excuse to talk about something unrelated.
Not content with deliberately communicating in a confusing and hostile manner and refusing to clarify or stop when asked, you’ve now progressed to overt ableism in using “not very bright” as an insult and implying someone not understanding your deliberately incomprehensible method of communication is “not very bright”.