Not everyone who opposes Firefox is a cryptodick. The person above is incorrect. Use a fork that doesn’t send telemetry, or get a pihole, sure, but pretending like this isn’t a disgusting betrayal by the only decent browser available is just factually inaccurate.
Again, the person above is wrong. They did not move the text. They “clarified” that what they actually mean is that they DO sell your data, they just try to anonymize it. This is specifically NOT what they claimed in the diffed text. This is a betrayal.
IIRC they just moved that text elsewhere
edit: MY BAD I RECALLED INCORRECTLY
Yeah, but how will the Brave shills shill their crypto slop by telling the truth?
Not everyone who opposes Firefox is a cryptodick. The person above is incorrect. Use a fork that doesn’t send telemetry, or get a pihole, sure, but pretending like this isn’t a disgusting betrayal by the only decent browser available is just factually inaccurate.
Not saying FF is free of fault or anything, far from it, but moving text is a disgusting betrayal? really?
Again, the person above is wrong. They did not move the text. They “clarified” that what they actually mean is that they DO sell your data, they just try to anonymize it. This is specifically NOT what they claimed in the diffed text. This is a betrayal.
“Don’t be evil”.
Looking at the ars technica article shared in this thread, that does not seem to be the case. They just removed it.
Where? Because IIRC, they didn’t.