Why in case of a stab (especially if the person stabbed is significantly tall) - its the belly which usually gets wounded?

I (21f) am a pretty short (5’2") fencer (HEMA, rapier), and I often get advice to target a tall opponent’s belly with my rapier. Also I’ve attended a self-defense class, and the instructor gave me advice to go for the abdomen of a tall attacker, if I have a pocket knife in my hand.

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Why are you so weirdly specific and focused about this topic in particular? Yesterday you posted about this same topic and deleted all your comments and the post itself.

    It’s… peculiar, to say the least.

  • BougieBirdie@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I took a self defense class once that covered attackers with a knife. Most of the class was around defending against attacks on the belly, the instructor said it was the most obvious target. That makes sense too, it’s high lethality, hurts like a bastard, isn’t protected by bones, and it’s in easy reach for most people.

    In the context of fencing, I’d have to guess there’s two things at play. First, if you’re much shorter than your opponent, I’d guess the belly is roughly the same height as where you’ve been practicing striking people anyway. Second, if your opponent is especially tall, then strikes against the belly are further away from his perspective (his eyes are up here), and that might put them at a disadvantage.

    I don’t know much about fencing, so correct me where I’m wrong, but I imagine the belly is the physically lowest legal target to score a point? I’d think that technically anybody would be disadvantaged to defend the lowest point, but their height makes it more pronounced. If you’re 5’2" your belly is something like two feet below your eyes, but if you’re 6’3" it’s like three feet. That’s a pretty significant difference.

  • edgemaster72@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Fucking hell we’re back to this shit? This is the worst Lemmy meme by far, I’d rather someone bring back the moths, or the beans, or the moths that bark at you and shoot beans out of their mouths

  • cattywampas@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The belly is a big, soft target. If you aim for center of mass there’s a good chance you hit a bone.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    The Human Body “center of mass” is at or above the hips, it’s where the majority of weight is and all movement is around this point: standing is holding this point up, walking is pushing this point from behind it, etc. It’s generally a slower target than extremities and upper body.

  • philpo@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Tbf, I am tall and I am much happier to be stabbed into the abomen than higher up, if you must insist on stabbing me.

    • anneSong@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Getting stabbed in the belly could be as fatal as getting stabbed in the chest. But a belly stab would hurt much more

      • philpo@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        3 hours ago

        No. Survival chances of a stab to the chest(aka the ‘cardiac box’) or neck is far far more lethal than a abdominal stabbing wound. Even stab wounds to the groin are more lethal.

        Source: Critical care paramedic.