When I look at Mamdani, I don’t see some radical departure. I see him as an heir to the Yiddish socialism that helped build New York
Opinion - Molly Crabapple
1 Jan 2026[very heart-warming and informative article]
For all the hysteria, when I look at Mamdani, I didn’t see some radical departure from the past. I see him as the heir to an old and venerable Jewish tradition – that of Yiddish socialism – which helped build New York.
In some cases, the link is direct. Bruce Vladeck, a member of one of Mamdani’s transition committees, is a well-respected expert on Medicare, but for the sake of this article, his credentials matter less than his surname.
Vladeck is the grandson of Baruch Charney Vladeck, a Marxist troublemaker from the Pale of Settlement, a tract of land in the Russian empire where Jews were permitted to live at a time of rampant antisemitic oppression. Baruch showed up in New York after the failed Russian revolution of 1905 with a Cossack’s saber scars all over his face. He later became a socialist alderman and member of Mayor Fiorello La Guardia’s housing administration. Vladeck was not actually his birth name. It was rather a nom de guerre, adopted when he joined the Jewish Labor Bund, the socialist, secular and defiantly anti-Zionist movement whose slogan, “here where we live is our country,” would make an apt tagline for Mamdani’s New York.


Great article.
Calling Mamdani antisemitic is an embarassing claim to make.
Find me a clip of Mamdani targetting a particular religion or ethnicity as “the other” or “the enemy”.
You can’t that is not how Mamdani thinks and moves politically, which is specifically why he is so popular in the US. If Mamdani started targetting jews in his rhetoric and policies his popularity would implode as it would go directly against what makes him popular.
Calling criticisms of the state of Israel antisemitic is, at this point, antisemitic.