• Thorry@feddit.org
        31·
        11 days ago

        No? Why would that make it legal?

        You could argue jurisprudence, but that would mean there had to be an actual ruling in the past. There wasn’t so it isn’t relevant.

        The whole argument is like a small child’s defense of “He did it first!”. This is the real grown-up world we are talking about, not some schoolground.

        • Redkid1324@lemmy.world
          31·
          11 days ago

          Well yes and no if you are pissed at trump for doing it you have to be equally pissed at Obama

          • Thorry@feddit.org
            12·
            11 days ago

            And that would be what we call a what aboutism and false equivalency fallacy.

            Go away troll

            • Redkid1324@lemmy.world
              21·
              11 days ago

              False equivalency huh?

              How can you have a moral conversation or opinion about something when your morals are skewed to begin with and you won’t recognize that.