Please include sources for any claims; baseless speculation is counterproductive. Remember that this is not a win for the US, just another outburst of a dying empire.

  • rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml
    23·
    2 days ago

    Delcy Rodríguez on economic exchange with the US: “Venezuela’s economic relations will continue to be diversified”

    Venezuela’s interim president, Delcy Rodríguez, clarified that the January 3rd attack has created a blemish on relations with the United States unlike anything seen before . However, she emphasized that this does not impede the flow of trade that has been maintained throughout history.

    However, she emphasized that this scenario does not halt the country’s dynamism in the international market, where Venezuela continues to consolidate its presence in a sovereign manner.

    She specified that of the 71% of the oil export market, 27% is destined for the United States, confirming that the economic relationship remains active despite the serious political conflict.

    Source -> https://venezuela-news.com/delcy-rodriguez-sobre-intercambio-economico-eeuu-relaciones-economicas-venezuela-seguiran-siendo-diversificadas/

    • Saymaz@lemmygrad.ml
      8·
      2 days ago

      The victims are helpless when the bully has all the support in their part of the hemisphere.

    • sousmerde_rtrdataire@lemmygrad.ml
      4·
      2 days ago

      Here’s the full declaration(, automatic spanish subtitles translated in english works well).
      Does anyone here think that they shouldn’t ?

      The argument/fear would be that they survived until now partly because they were authoritarian&cautious enough to prevent multiple coup attempts that would have worked in a lot of other countries(, but also because they got through economically, etc.). What if the u.s. warmed up the relations only to get close enough with them to do a coup ?

      I’d like to believe that after so many years they won’t put themselves in a situation where the expected western betrayal has too much of an impact, among other precautions.
      I also believe in their participatory(&protagonic) process(, its critics would prefer bourgeois democracies). A contented population is useful against coups, and if all goes well economically then the best is yet to come and they’ll have many more reasons to be proud of their collective accomplishments.
      They ‘know what’s at stake’/‘feel the “weight of the centuries”’ better than i do, and won’t lower their guard, may there be no more killings&destructions.

      • rainpizza@lemmygrad.ml
        9·
        2 days ago

        The “authoritarian” word is an idealist concept and it is not a very helpful word to describe the reality that we live in. By definition, every single state in this world is authoritarian.

        As for understanding why Venezuela keeps trading with the US which seems to be your question judging by the news of the US Embassy in Caracas, then this article in french may help -> https://histoireetsociete.com/enfin-une-position-politiquement-responsable-venant-du-venezuela-celle-de-thierry-deronne/

        Well, that article is basically a translation of people dispatch -> https://peoplesdispatch.org/2026/01/05/venezuelas-revolution-still-stands-debunking-trumps-psyop/

        Brief teaser:

        The subsequent statements from Caracas calling for dialogue and negotiations with the US must then be understood not as capitulation, but as a retreat under duress. The objective conditions are severe. Right-wing shifts in Argentina, Paraguay, Ecuador, El Salvador, Peru, and Bolivia, and vacillation by progressive governments in Brazil, Colombia, and Mexico, mean that Venezuela faces political isolation in Latin America. The material and political support it has received from allied governments in Russia and China clearly is not enough to deter US imperialism from another aggression. The continued naval blockade and the demonstrated existential threat posed by further US military action remain the most significant challenges.

        In his first statement on January 3, Trump implied that Delcy Rodriguez had expressed a willingness to cooperate with the US and meet its demands. Some on the left believed him, interpreting this as a sign of Delcy’s capitulation. Her press conference that same day reaffirmed Venezuela’s sovereignty and its own demands to the US, including the release of President Maduro. The next day, Delcy, after leading a meeting of the party leadership and government ministers – during which the unity of the party, the masses, and the military was reaffirmed – published a message to the world, clearly directed at Trump and the United States government. She called on the US government to work together with Venezuela towards peace and development, but on terms of sovereignty and equality. This should not be interpreted as either betrayal or capitulation. In fact, this statement echoes every statement made by Maduro over the last three months and throughout the years of tensions with the US. Maduro himself consistently called for diplomacy and negotiation to avoid an all-out war, and had already offered to negotiate comprehensive economic agreements with the US for Venezuela’s oil and mineral resources. If the Venezuelan state were to sign such deals going forward – now with Maduro kidnapped – it would not constitute treason.

        • sousmerde_rtrdataire@lemmygrad.ml
          3·
          22 hours ago

          (if you’re french, and so many beyond the ex-director of Le Monde Diplomatique, e.g. 1, 2, and more, i didn’t know/expected that they had such direct access to H.Chávez and N.Maduro)

          More informations :

          The Government of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela reiterates its international condemnation of being the victim of a criminal, illegitimate, and illegal aggression against its territory and its people, an action that has resulted in the deaths of more than one hundred civilians and military personnel who, in defense of the Homeland, were killed in flagrant violation of international law.
          As is well known, within the framework of this aggression, the illegal kidnapping of the Constitutional President of the Republic, Nicolás Maduro Moros, and the First Lady, Cilia Flores, took place, an act that constitutes a serious violation of the personal immunity of heads of state and of the fundamental principles of the international legal order.
          In order to address this situation within the framework of international law, and in strict adherence to the principles of national sovereignty and Bolivarian Peace Diplomacy, the Bolivarian Government of Venezuela has decided to initiate an exploratory diplomatic process with the Government of the United States of America, aimed at re-establishing diplomatic missions in both countries, with the purpose of addressing the consequences of the aggression and kidnapping of the President of the Republic and the First Lady, as well as addressing a working agenda of mutual interest
          In this context, a delegation of diplomatic officials from the United States Department of State arrives in the country to conduct technical and logistical assessments inherent to the diplomatic function. Likewise, a delegation of Venezuelan diplomats will be sent to the United States to carry out the corresponding tasks. As the Acting President, Delcy Rodriguez, has reiterated, Venezuela will confront this aggression through diplomatic channels, convinced that Bolivarian Diplomacy of Peace is the legitimate path for the defense of sovereignty, the restoration of international law, and the preservation of peace.
          Caracas, January 9, 2026.