It doesn’t lead automatically to hateful, it however helps a lot. It’s much easier to turn a stupid person into a hateful one than to do it with an educated person.
That’s where the “malice” part of the original kicks in. I failed to note in my post that my own version is an addendum to the rule, not a replacement.
If your choices and actions consistently hurt other people, and you refuse to listen when people point it out and change your ways, then you’re evil. No matter how stupid you are.
There are plenty of dumb and/or ignorant people who are kind and generous and who are not fucking bigots who make life hell for everyone around them.
Because the Dems ran a lackluster campaign that promised more of the same, telling everyone that the economy is doing great while everyone is struggling. Orange man at least offered hope that things would change. People NEED hope. And with trust of the government at an all time low, with some serious money in media manipulation, this is what we get
Because people are struggling and don’t donate time to stay informed from reliable sources. They see the story that is pushed to them by social media algorithms… which have been bought
Yeah bringing out Cheney was a mistake but her policy platform never pivoted, just the PR stepped away from “identity politics” which all the dumbfuck both sidesers were (and still are) demanding from the Dems. Fuck the both sidesers and all the dipshits that use the term identity politics unironically.
I don’t think that’s the correct take. Both times it was maintain status quo vs a disruptor. The status quo has been terrible for the majority of Americans so they were willing to take the risk on the disruptor. That’s the same reason people split ticket voted for both Trump and AOC, they’re both disruptors.
Oh yeah the status quo of green energy, massive infrastructure investments, supporting Ukraine, EVs, PACT act, drug price controls, marijuana pardons, student debt relief, etc. How dare they!!!
The pathetic support of Ukraine barely giving them enough to just hang in the fight. Drug prices for 4 drugs. Alleviating the symptom of student debt and ignoring the root problem. Ignoring housing affordability. Ignoring the growing wealth inequality. Add on to of that parading around Bush era conservatives… Yeah, the status quo that needs to be disrupted.
It’s not surprising that the DNC picking someone who dropped even before Iowa during the previous primaries was not a good strategy.
Oh yeah supplying Ukraine with weapons and rallying all the allies to do the same is soooo much worse than Trump’s “just surrender” policy. B-B-B both sides same!!!
4 drugs? Just going off memory it was in the range of 10 or 12. So this is the point where I stop reading your lies.
I’m not both siding anything. One side is significantly better as you have even shown. Biden only gave barely enough weapons at every stage of the war. He never gave enough for Ukraine to fight back, only enough to hold Russia off. Yes, far better than the just give up strategy, but not exactly something to be proud of. Which kind of sums up all of Biden’s tenure.
Lol, you’re right it was 10 drugs. So successful a whole 10 drugs! When they announced that “success” the entire countries response was, “and?”
Biden only won because of how badly Trump fumbled his Covid response. Anyone would have won against Trump in that specific election. In 2016 and 2024 the political climate was very different and the DNC chose basically the only candidates that would lose to Trump. Bernie was/is a disruptor with a big supportive base that could have beat Trump. In 2024 the person who polled the worst against Trump was Biden, the second worst was Harris, yet “unnamed democrat” dominated the polls. Yes, be mad at the voters, but also be mad at the DNC who sacrificed everyone’s future to push the status quo instead of embracing real change despite the voters clearly signaling that’s what they want.
Bernie couldn’t beat Hillary, he didn’t stand a chance. The whole idea that Bernie stood a chance against either Hillary or Trump was actual literal Russian propaganda. The only people that like Bernie don’t vote, and the ones that do voted for Hillary because she stood a much better chance against Trump. It was never even a little bit close with Bernie, and before you go blah blah DNC collusion (which is also largely ruspublican agitprop) Bernie still would have lost soundly, the Democratic party voters were not going to nominate someone that isn’t in the goddamn party. This also ignores the majority of Dem voters are neoliberals and think socialism is a dirty word. Bernie never fucking stood a chance. At all. Whatsoever.
That’s not how that works. The voters picked Hillary in 16 to run with the party nomination. The voters stuck with the incumbent, and when they dropped out due to health reasons the secondary stood in as is standard practice. If you’ve got an issue with it you should have fucking registered Dem and voted in the primaries like intelligent responsible civically engaged citizens do. Instead of bitching on the internet about shit you clearly don’t understand.
You’re ignoring how the DNC used super delegates to sway the primary votes in 16. They also provided Clinton with the debate questions ahead of time. They did everything in their power to tip the scales toward Clinton. In 2020 they changed the primary order to favor Biden, discouraged people from running against him, and even considered cutting the primaries early. Again they did everything in their power to pick Biden. Then when Biden dropped, they had time to at least hold a vote at the convention, but instead they appointed Harris. Btw, I did vote in those primaries, I donated to the Sanders campaign too.
Because Clinton was a member of the fucking party and Bernie wasn’t. Like holy shit, of course they didn’t want someone who isn’t actually part of the party to be the party nominee. What the fuck are you all smoking that everyone ignores the fact Bernie was never going to win the Democratic nomination because he wasn’t in the Democratic party. It’s not complicated shit.
To be fair, none of the voters had proof that Trump was retarded when he was first elected… they were warned, and many suspected, but who was to say that monster couldn’t successfully run a country. I saw who he really was and voted accordingly, But im just one person. Also, the whole Hillary/Bernie primary shit that I dont remember the details of. Also, Hillary Clinton was a weird robot.
But for his second run, we had his whole first term as evidence of his incompetence. Despite the fact that Harris was a bummer of a candidate and a major misstep by the dems, we still had trumps first term as evidence of his inability to serve as president.
What the fuck.
If it truly is America wont vote for a woman (I honestly dont believe it, but i’m a dude so im probably blind to a lot of it)…and if it truly was the end of democracy for trump to win, why the fuck did they run Harris?
We had decades of proof going back into the 80s that he was a cheap con man and a racist and a rapist. None of that was remotely new information, just a bunch of dumb fucks were like hurdur guy from apprentice.
It is absolutely more correct than this disruptor bullshit, that’s an excuse for stupid people to absolve themselves of the responsibility of being informed and engaged.
So you’re acknowledging the voting trends are sexist. If anything voting trends overwhelmingly favor the status quo over “disruptors” because we knew better than to tolerate demagogues.
I still don’t understand how DJT was re-elected.
People want evil, simple as that.
No they want bread and circus. But bread costed too much so here come the clowns.
How fucking low do you have to be to be a volunteer clown for the fucking circus?
American level low.
MAGAts are not as evil as they are stupid.
I have never really seen that postulate as practical in the real world. I prefer my own
version(EDIT: addendum; failed to describe properly):I always go with if the results of the stupidity are indistinguishable from malice, you can go ahead and attribute it to malice.
That explains the position of the higher-ups in the party, but the voter? The voter is not profit-driven, the voter is just fucking stupid.
And racist and hateful, and lastly they’re stupid and lazy. Go back to football you dumb cunts you’re fucking up the entire world
They are racist because they are too stupid to understand that immigrants are helping their economy much more than they are hurting it.
They are hateful because they are too stupid. They hate what they can’t comprehend (which is pretty much everything outside their small bubble).
Stupid doesn’t automatically lead to hateful
That has to be taught or trained in, which is the issue I take with these hateful trash “people”
They’re monsters who create monsters who vote for monsters
It doesn’t lead automatically to hateful, it however helps a lot. It’s much easier to turn a stupid person into a hateful one than to do it with an educated person.
also very sexist.
That’s where the “malice” part of the original kicks in. I failed to note in my post that my own version is an addendum to the rule, not a replacement.
If your choices and actions consistently hurt other people, and you refuse to listen when people point it out and change your ways, then you’re evil. No matter how stupid you are.
There are plenty of dumb and/or ignorant people who are kind and generous and who are not fucking bigots who make life hell for everyone around them.
Edit, typo
Malicious people must just adore that fucking phrase.
It’s both.
That’s the problem they’re evil because theyre too dumb to know what they’re doing
Because the Dems ran a lackluster campaign that promised more of the same, telling everyone that the economy is doing great while everyone is struggling. Orange man at least offered hope that things would change. People NEED hope. And with trust of the government at an all time low, with some serious money in media manipulation, this is what we get
… but how it was not obvious to all that orange man was lying, is the bit that gets me.
Because people are struggling and don’t donate time to stay informed from reliable sources. They see the story that is pushed to them by social media algorithms… which have been bought
Americans are really goddamn stupid and selfish.
Easier and more accurate answer - The Democrats ran a woman in a deeply misogynistic country
That didn’t help but the core issue there was Harris’s sharp pivot to the right.
Yeah bringing out Cheney was a mistake but her policy platform never pivoted, just the PR stepped away from “identity politics” which all the dumbfuck both sidesers were (and still are) demanding from the Dems. Fuck the both sidesers and all the dipshits that use the term identity politics unironically.
That’s when a real leader claps back with “Thye aren’t identity politics. They’re civil fucking rights.”
Racism. Trump promised a lot of it, and he is delivering onthat promise.
Because American voters preferred to have this than to have a woman president. For the second time.
I don’t think that’s the correct take. Both times it was maintain status quo vs a disruptor. The status quo has been terrible for the majority of Americans so they were willing to take the risk on the disruptor. That’s the same reason people split ticket voted for both Trump and AOC, they’re both disruptors.
Oh yeah the status quo of green energy, massive infrastructure investments, supporting Ukraine, EVs, PACT act, drug price controls, marijuana pardons, student debt relief, etc. How dare they!!!
The pathetic support of Ukraine barely giving them enough to just hang in the fight. Drug prices for 4 drugs. Alleviating the symptom of student debt and ignoring the root problem. Ignoring housing affordability. Ignoring the growing wealth inequality. Add on to of that parading around Bush era conservatives… Yeah, the status quo that needs to be disrupted.
It’s not surprising that the DNC picking someone who dropped even before Iowa during the previous primaries was not a good strategy.
Oh yeah supplying Ukraine with weapons and rallying all the allies to do the same is soooo much worse than Trump’s “just surrender” policy. B-B-B both sides same!!!
4 drugs? Just going off memory it was in the range of 10 or 12. So this is the point where I stop reading your lies.
I’m not both siding anything. One side is significantly better as you have even shown. Biden only gave barely enough weapons at every stage of the war. He never gave enough for Ukraine to fight back, only enough to hold Russia off. Yes, far better than the just give up strategy, but not exactly something to be proud of. Which kind of sums up all of Biden’s tenure.
Lol, you’re right it was 10 drugs. So successful a whole 10 drugs! When they announced that “success” the entire countries response was, “and?”
Total coincidence it was a woman versus a wildly unfit man both times that the women lost!
Well, no. Both women were picked by the DNC and not by the voters.
A fucking ham sandwich should’ve won against Trump. A man did.
Biden only won because of how badly Trump fumbled his Covid response. Anyone would have won against Trump in that specific election. In 2016 and 2024 the political climate was very different and the DNC chose basically the only candidates that would lose to Trump. Bernie was/is a disruptor with a big supportive base that could have beat Trump. In 2024 the person who polled the worst against Trump was Biden, the second worst was Harris, yet “unnamed democrat” dominated the polls. Yes, be mad at the voters, but also be mad at the DNC who sacrificed everyone’s future to push the status quo instead of embracing real change despite the voters clearly signaling that’s what they want.
Bernie couldn’t beat Hillary, he didn’t stand a chance. The whole idea that Bernie stood a chance against either Hillary or Trump was actual literal Russian propaganda. The only people that like Bernie don’t vote, and the ones that do voted for Hillary because she stood a much better chance against Trump. It was never even a little bit close with Bernie, and before you go blah blah DNC collusion (which is also largely ruspublican agitprop) Bernie still would have lost soundly, the Democratic party voters were not going to nominate someone that isn’t in the goddamn party. This also ignores the majority of Dem voters are neoliberals and think socialism is a dirty word. Bernie never fucking stood a chance. At all. Whatsoever.
That’s not how that works. The voters picked Hillary in 16 to run with the party nomination. The voters stuck with the incumbent, and when they dropped out due to health reasons the secondary stood in as is standard practice. If you’ve got an issue with it you should have fucking registered Dem and voted in the primaries like intelligent responsible civically engaged citizens do. Instead of bitching on the internet about shit you clearly don’t understand.
You’re ignoring how the DNC used super delegates to sway the primary votes in 16. They also provided Clinton with the debate questions ahead of time. They did everything in their power to tip the scales toward Clinton. In 2020 they changed the primary order to favor Biden, discouraged people from running against him, and even considered cutting the primaries early. Again they did everything in their power to pick Biden. Then when Biden dropped, they had time to at least hold a vote at the convention, but instead they appointed Harris. Btw, I did vote in those primaries, I donated to the Sanders campaign too.
Because Clinton was a member of the fucking party and Bernie wasn’t. Like holy shit, of course they didn’t want someone who isn’t actually part of the party to be the party nominee. What the fuck are you all smoking that everyone ignores the fact Bernie was never going to win the Democratic nomination because he wasn’t in the Democratic party. It’s not complicated shit.
Lol, okay so you do understand that the process was rigged and resulted in bad candidates that lost. I accept your apology.
To be fair, none of the voters had proof that Trump was retarded when he was first elected… they were warned, and many suspected, but who was to say that monster couldn’t successfully run a country. I saw who he really was and voted accordingly, But im just one person. Also, the whole Hillary/Bernie primary shit that I dont remember the details of. Also, Hillary Clinton was a weird robot.
But for his second run, we had his whole first term as evidence of his incompetence. Despite the fact that Harris was a bummer of a candidate and a major misstep by the dems, we still had trumps first term as evidence of his inability to serve as president.
What the fuck.
If it truly is America wont vote for a woman (I honestly dont believe it, but i’m a dude so im probably blind to a lot of it)…and if it truly was the end of democracy for trump to win, why the fuck did they run Harris?
What the fuck.
I dont get it.
We had decades of proof going back into the 80s that he was a cheap con man and a racist and a rapist. None of that was remotely new information, just a bunch of dumb fucks were like hurdur guy from apprentice.
It is absolutely more correct than this disruptor bullshit, that’s an excuse for stupid people to absolve themselves of the responsibility of being informed and engaged.
Only if you completely ignore the voting trends of modern history.
So you’re acknowledging the voting trends are sexist. If anything voting trends overwhelmingly favor the status quo over “disruptors” because we knew better than to tolerate demagogues.
American voters had a choice between utterly corrupt oligarchy enablers and entertaining utterly corrupt oligarchy enablers. Are you not entertained?
No, they had a choice between a worthless piece of shit and a passingly decent woman.
At least Kamala would have cared about the optics of her presidency.
He cheated.
Well they kinda cheated but mostly Americans fuckin suck.
He wasn’t.