• Rhynoplaz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I used to have a friend who was extremely skilled at this technique. He would put together an argument so nonsensical that despite being obviously false, nobody could possibly even begin to know how to start refuting any of it. If you challenged one point, he would use three other false yet logical statements to defend it.

    • EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 hours ago

      That’s when I would interrupt the person with, “stop, you’ve made your claims, now it is my turn to talk and address each point you made.” And if they refuse to stop, I go with this: “Since you refuse to let me speak, this conversation is over.” And I walk away.

      They also don’t like it when I start taking notes on their key points and start calling them out on contradictions.

        • EmpatheticTeddyBear@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          No. Having a debate requires both parties to actually listen to each other’s arguments/talking points. When one party refuses to listen, it is no longer a debate. By constantly interrupting, they demonstrate they were never there to have a debate/conversation, but were only there to preach.