• jaybone@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    It was a good idea when it was super niche. And people were using MUDS and newsgroups.

    As soon as marketing and capitalism figured out they could use it to control media content and sell it to the masses, we began down this road where we are now, with a few billionaire monopolies running everything.

    It had two waves. The first was in the 90s and it was about access. Starting with dialup AOL, genie, prodigy and all those free CDs in the mail. Then the telecoms wanted in and that was that, for a while. Then in another ~10 years, since they couldn’t control access (as that was then universal) they had to control backend content, and now we have the billionaire monopolies in the services themselves, X, Facebook, etc.

    It had a good run there for a while though.

    • Deceptichum@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      It’s still a great idea.

      Be mindful of anyone who wants to remove your ability to freely communicate with the world and seek out knowledge.

      And you already had the billionaire monopolies before the Internet, they are the newspaper, radio, and tv station owners. Now you have common people in competition with them in the space of public discourse.

      The Internet isn’t perfect, but it is the best we have to date and fuck anyone who wants to go back from it.

    • Railing5132@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      It was great when it was niche. It was an exploding universe of optimism, unique experiences, and content when the worst we had to deal with was annoying banner ads.