Well I can just say I started a business while being a broke student and without a penny to my name. Just find the first customer and start working. The money is shit but it fed my baby and wife and a small apartment. Kept working my ass off several years and started employing some of my fellow students. You argue you have to have money to make money, but according to you all those people earn so much more money. Nobody talks about all these years invested into getting up that point. I’m nearly forty and can now slowly start saving some money while most of my peers are paying off their first home while living in it. My employees are payed well and like working for me. I don’t think calling that exploitation would be in any way correct. I feel the hate, and I understand not everybody has marketable skills but I was basically a Linux and coding nerd without a degree with a baby and wife and no family to help. Its hard and I had the opportunity and I feel most business owner got their start like that. There are obviously people with rich parents yada yada and obviously not every business works with zero capital startup money but that’s just how it is.
I’ll translate: “I got lucky doing the exact same thing everyone does that is working hard and making money in the ways that were available to me but I assume I have what I have because I worked hard and the rest did not, not even the people I work with. I managed to find financial stability that in time allowed me to collaborate with others to grow something that we ended up building together but I own, and although they work “with” me I tell myself they work “for” me because I did it, I, it is mine and thanks to myself, and everything capitalism has allowed me to achieve is thanks to my own. I understand there are people that do not need to struggle like I did but since there is no reason for any of this to be then I tell myself “that’s just how it is” I found food, why aren’t others happy?”
You say people are willing to give a large portion of their produced value for “heavily reduced risk of income fluctuation”? Like that’s what the exchange is. Like if the company does bad and bankrupts they’ll still have their job and earnings. Tell them everyone at the business will earn a fluctuating amount of the wealth the company makes equally distributed and if the company does bad it will lower, but you’re all in it together. xd
I understand survivorship bias and i understand there is luck involved. But that doesn’t change that somebody has to do business and that everybody can try and that being an employer is not as simply evil as people here want to believe.
Well I can just say I started a business while being a broke student and without a penny to my name. Just find the first customer and start working. The money is shit but it fed my baby and wife and a small apartment. Kept working my ass off several years and started employing some of my fellow students. You argue you have to have money to make money, but according to you all those people earn so much more money. Nobody talks about all these years invested into getting up that point. I’m nearly forty and can now slowly start saving some money while most of my peers are paying off their first home while living in it. My employees are payed well and like working for me. I don’t think calling that exploitation would be in any way correct. I feel the hate, and I understand not everybody has marketable skills but I was basically a Linux and coding nerd without a degree with a baby and wife and no family to help. Its hard and I had the opportunity and I feel most business owner got their start like that. There are obviously people with rich parents yada yada and obviously not every business works with zero capital startup money but that’s just how it is.
I’ll translate: “I got lucky doing the exact same thing everyone does that is working hard and making money in the ways that were available to me but I assume I have what I have because I worked hard and the rest did not, not even the people I work with. I managed to find financial stability that in time allowed me to collaborate with others to grow something that we ended up building together but I own, and although they work “with” me I tell myself they work “for” me because I did it, I, it is mine and thanks to myself, and everything capitalism has allowed me to achieve is thanks to my own. I understand there are people that do not need to struggle like I did but since there is no reason for any of this to be then I tell myself “that’s just how it is” I found food, why aren’t others happy?”
You say people are willing to give a large portion of their produced value for “heavily reduced risk of income fluctuation”? Like that’s what the exchange is. Like if the company does bad and bankrupts they’ll still have their job and earnings. Tell them everyone at the business will earn a fluctuating amount of the wealth the company makes equally distributed and if the company does bad it will lower, but you’re all in it together. xd
I understand survivorship bias and i understand there is luck involved. But that doesn’t change that somebody has to do business and that everybody can try and that being an employer is not as simply evil as people here want to believe.