The effects of Doge’s initial blitz through the federal government – which included dismantling the US Agency for International Development (USAID), embedding staffers in almost every agency and illegally firing people en masse – are still playing out. Contrary to Musk’s promises, Doge’s success is vague and tough to quantify. Measuring the full impact and determining whether the agency even exists as a centralized entity anymore is difficult, complicated by an ongoing effort from the government to block disclosure of documents, which is itself a symptom of the chaos that the department created.

Although the disarray and destruction left by Doge is evident across the globe, we still do not really know exactly how the agency operated and its true effects. Instead, humanitarian aid organizations are still trying to assess the extent of the damage that Doge created while ethics watchdogs have launched lawsuits trying to compel more transparency out of the government.

“I know it feels like all this happened over the course of several years, but the first year of this administration isn’t even done,” said Nikhel Sus, the deputy chief counsel at Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (Crew). “We still want to know what happened, and we still want the record to be out there, because the public is entitled to this information.”

Outside of the US, Doge’s cuts to USAID have also caused months of turmoil in countries around the world as humanitarian organizations struggle to make up for lost funding and calculate whether they can continue their operations at all. Thousands of aid workers have lost their jobs, testing for diseases such as HIV/Aids has drastically declined and researchers have warned there could be around 14 million excess deaths across the globe in the next five years if the US fails to restore aid funding. Yet because of the nature of Doge’s cuts, non-profits including the International Aids Society (IAS) say that it’s hard to pin down the exact numbers of people who are affected.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I don’t understand what exactly is going on, but it seems really weird to me that Kash Patel is moving the FBI HQ into the building that was previously occupied by USAID before the DOGE sledgehammer.

    https://www.fox5dc.com/news/fbi-closing-headquarters-j-edgar-hoover-building-kash-patel-announces

    I remember there was some kind of a controversy with members of DOGE showing up to USAID and demanding access to sensitive information about individuals in other countries who were working undercover with the U.S.

    Again, no idea what the full story is, but definitely seems like a bit concerning, considering the Trump administration’s unusual level of friendliness with countries like Russia and Saudi Arabia.

    Edit: so fucking weird

    March 2025: USAID staff invited to attend a daylong event to burn and shred classified documents, email says

    In an email sent to certain employees and obtained by Fortune, USAID’s Acting Executive Secretary, Erica Carr, asked staff to shred and burn classified documents and personnel documents cleared from the agency’s headquarters.

    She told staff to meet at USAID HQ from 9:30 a.m. on Tuesday for the daylong event.

    “Shred as many documents first and reserve the burn bags for when the shredder becomes unavailable or needs a break,” Carr said in the email. “If you need to use the burn bags, do not overfill, and ensure the burn bag can be closed with staples at the top.”

    She added that burn bags should be labeled with the words “SECRET” and “USAID/(B/IO)” in a dark marker

    One former USAID worker, whose identity is known to Fortune, said documents may still be preserved electronically, adding that the loss of the Ronald Reagan Building, the USAID headquarters, meant there was limited space to safely store hard copies.

    Btw IO is the Bureau of International Organization Affairs

    The IO is charged with developing and implementing the policies of the U.S. government with respect to the United Nations and its affiliated agencies, as well as within certain other international organizations. The Bureau of International Organization Affairs was created in order to strengthen the United States involvement in important international relations.