• kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      Elon Musk was defending UBI recently.

      This version of UBI is a capitalist trap. Make everything a subscription, make everything rented not owned, replace most jobs with AI, give you a monthly allowance. Now you need to feed all that money into their products and services, and they can make sure you’ll never have enough to escape. Its feudalism with extra steps and some computers.

      • xxam925@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        How about we remove the b?

        Universal income. No accumulation of Capital. No robber barons. Everybody gets the same and you use it as you see fit.

        Just… live your life.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      12 hours ago

      When the permanent unemployment rate starts to hit 25% or more, we are either going to have to have UBI, or reduce the population by the unemployment rate.

      Which solution will be endorsed by which party, and how will they implement that solution?

      Be reminded that Stephen “PeeWee Himmler” Miller has already told Trump that he wants to reduce the population of America from 350 million to 100 million. That’s about a 70% reduction. What do you suppose his “solution” would be?

      • Jack_Burton@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Vietnam and McNamara conveniently reduced the unemployment rate. Trump just bombed Nigeria and has eyes on Venezuela. History may not repeat but it often rhymes.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Unemployment during Vietnam was about as low as it is today.

          The real human demand of Vietnam was with a very narrow subset of the population - young men between the ages of 17 and 45 (with a heavy bias towards the lower end) - for a comparatively limited term of service (average 1 year). By contrast, the Iraq War didn’t employ youth conscription. It used the “backdoor draft” to deploy national guard reservists and to force existing enlisted troops back into repeated deployments for upwards of eight years. That also didn’t have a meaningful impact on unemployment during the Bush Administration (notable for a comparatively high unemployment rate, particularly post 2006).

          Trump doesn’t fix a flood of unemployed people (particularly older people) with war. If anything, he just amplifies the domestic dissent against his administration, which will likely result in more economic pain and higher rates of joblessness.

          • Maeve@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Water wars, climate disaster, will lead to lives lost. Food scarcity, antivax, cutting the social safety net further, lack of education…

      • Zahille7@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I don’t care how racist/fascist/terrible you are, how the fuck would the country run with so few people? Like, the population would have to be consolidated to one general area right?

        Like say for instance it happens, there are now only 100 million Americans living in the US; where are they all living? Northeast close to New York and DC? Closer to California and Nevada? Or are they all just gonna be spread out across the country that everything is going to be small-town America again?

        • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Only a few thousand will live privileged lives. The rest will serve them. If they don’t like it, they can arrange to be unemployed, but since unemployment is now criminalized, with the punishment being the death penalty, it is unlikely there will be much conflict.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 hours ago

      AI isn’t going to take your jobs, though. AI is going to take over management of the economy, which is a very different thing.

      The jobs will still exist, because manual labor continues to be far cheaper to produce and deploy than machine labor. The conditions of employment will get worse over time, as computer management tools prioritize “efficiency” (aka margin of profit) over quality of life and ecological sustainability.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure we haven’t needed AI for the economy to be managed toward short-term gains at the cost of quality of life and the environment.

    • tym@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That, or an internment infrastructure currently being used to deport immigrants that can be easily refactored to house chain-gang denaturalized citizens who criticized the upper class… which will come true first?!