• yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    16 days ago

    So to be clear, you think elephants contemplate the meaning of life? Okay, and do you think they can grasp the bizarre fact that formal systems can’t prove their own consistency or even the concept of prime numbers?

    How many elephants are out there right now, wondering about the nature of right and wrong?

    Zero

    Zero elephants are doing any of that, because these are abstract concepts.

    • theneverfox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      But that’s exactly what I’m saying. There are elephants out there contemplating morality. Even dogs do it, even if it’s massively based on the rules we impose on them

      Not math though. Math exists in the minds of humans, it doesn’t even exist in the universe. There is no two of anything, there’s one object and another similar object

      What does exist are ratios and harmonics, and animals have no problem understanding them

      • yeahiknow3@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        15 days ago

        Math exists in the minds of humans, [not animals].

        This is incorrect. Every animal we’ve ever researched, including insects like bees, can do arithmetic.

        Anyway, not a single one of the examples you’ve given involves second-order reasoning. These are all prosaic interactions with the environment, which is how most animas (yes, including dumb humans) experience the world.

        First-order reasoning: “What is moral?” Second-order reasoning: “Do moral beliefs constitute knowledge claims?”

        First-order reasoning: “One plus one is two.” Second-order reasoning: “number theory is either inconsistent or incomplete.”

        First-order reasoning: “What does this word mean?” Second-order reasoning: “How do words connect with their meanings?”

        The examples I gave you are extreme, but to be fair so is your confusion.

        • theneverfox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          15 days ago

          I believe that orcas are out there having philosophical debates and singing stories of their history and mythology that dates back even further than our own. I don’t think they’re doing math proofs, but if they are I’d be curious what base they use

          All the cutting edge science suggests we’re not special. We are not different in kind from animals

          Since science became a thing, we’ve been drawing lines between us and animals since we could no longer gesture to the soul. We’ve progressively disproven every single one. I’ve had this debate over various lines so many times

          It’s human arrogance