• EonNShadow@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    There are Nazi furries but they’re ostracized from the rest of the community and banned from most cons/gatherings that aren’t run by them.

    They’re only well-known because we don’t like them, and their inflammatory stuff goes viral in our spaces, and sometimes they hit escape velocity, getting exposed to the wider internet.

    In reality like 85-90% of furs are left-wing to various degrees, and LGBTQ.

    • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      22 hours ago

      “What is truth?” The only thing that matters in terms of establishing a group’s (very much permanent) reputation is what percolates to the general cultural zeitgeist of people who don’t know what the word hypertext means. When the insular furry communities of the Y2K era kicked out the weird freaks who were actively hostile to the ideas of kink consent, consent in general, and non-white people continuing to draw breath, they descended on 4chan and SomethingAwful and various other forums and pretty much instantly solidified the unsuspecting public’s idea of furries as being creepy Nazis. It’s not fair, but you only get one shot at establishing an eternal reputation and it’s more or less completely out of your control.

      • Korne127@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I have absolutely no idea what you think is the “public’s idea” (well, besides your description). But for the record, what you describe may be your idea, but that isn’t even remotely representative and definitely isn’t the general idea or definition. I think the votes here tell that as well.

      • HatchetHaro@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        i love how you bring up sites where trolls and bigots congregate to make memes and spread misinformation to marginalize communities as a valid source.

        it’s like saying “i read on the news about so and so” and then citing some roadside graffiti.

      • EonNShadow@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        22 hours ago

        Yeah this sounds like a you problem.

        Reputations are anything but eternal and public opinion can change. Sounds like you need to get with the times

        • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          20
          ·
          22 hours ago

          “This is what I any many others observed” ≠ “These are the values I hold”

          Be attentive to what you read instead of selectively interpreting it to match your emotional reaction to the general idea.