• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In terms of functionality, it works well. The main limitation is software availability. If you rely on anything that can’t be built for the architecture then it’s not going to be a good daily driver.

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    it’s very affordable with the 16 GB RAM, 256 GB SSD, 13.6" model available for $750

    my new laptop literally is more than double in each spec and costed $100 less; i guess mac people have a definition of affordable whether they’re linux people or not.

    still, it’s nice to learn that this is an option now.

    • ferric_carcinization@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 hours ago

      my new laptop literally is more than double in each spec

      13.6"

      Where did you find a laptop with a 27.2" or larger screen?

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s not an apples to apples comparison because the architecture is so different. Notice his observation in the article:

      I am very impressed with how smooth and problem-free Asahi Linux is. It is incredibly responsive and feels even smoother than my Arch Linux desktop with a 16 core AMD Ryzen 7945HX and 64GB of RAM.

      M1 architecture has a huge advantage being a SoC and having shared memory between the CPU and the GPU which avoids the need for a bus. I’m still using M1 macbook with 8gb of RAM that I got to keep at one of my jobs a few years ago, and it’s incredibly snappy. I’ve tried x86 laptops with way better specs on paper, and they don’t come anywhere close in practice.

      • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Also the article says that in the context of paying for the apple physical laptop experience, which is really top notch (so everything other than the mobo and is immediate bits).

        Eg my use-case - I only ever need my laptop for extremely light work, so experience in handling it is way more important than the computing hardware.
        Actually I would still want a MacBook with like an Intel Pentium in it - but I can’t buy a good frame with a shitty CPU, I need to buy a better overall laptop.

        I still don’t own anything Apple, but with Linux I just might, that’s why I keep tabs on this project.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I really hope the project doesn’t die, they had some people leave recently and there was some drama over that. Apple hardware is really nice, and with Linux it would be strictly superior to macos which is just bloated garbage at this point. I’m also hoping we’ll see somebody else make a similar architecture to M series using ARM or RISCV targeting Linux. Maybe we’ll see some Chinese vendors go RISCV route in the future.

          • Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            33 minutes ago

            Yeah, I never though the project would cover apple silicon tbh, it’s amazing what they are doing.

            I too really hope RISC-V becomes a thing, slowly getting them foss PCs would be such a nice thing for humanity.
            (With EU curiously looking into it’s own independence maybe we could invest into our own RISC-V production …)