• H3mp79@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Accepting of all sexualities, genders , and races with a dumb fuck hammer and sickle. What alternate reality do you live in where the USSR was accepting of these?

    • Socialism_Everyday@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      40 minutes ago

      I agree regarding to sexualities, unfortunately the USSR had a very mistaken position with the criminalization of homosexuality (though I have no data about it being prosecuted particularly, prosecution data would be interesting to compare it to countries of its time).

      As for genders, the USSR enjoyed women suffrage from the beginning, and the Warsaw Pact had throughout its history higher female representation in public life, and by the 1960s, the USSR had more female engineers than the rest of the world combined. Between 1962 and 1964, 40% of PhDs in Chemistry in the USSR were awarded to women, compared to 5% in the USA. Valentina Tereshkova was the first woman in space.

      Regarding races, the USSR massively supported the emancipation and decolonization of countries in Latin America, Africa and Asia. The policy of Korenizatsiia is possibly the first example in history of positive discrimination and attempt at national minorities obtaining representation in legislative bodies. Over the existence of the USSR, all Soviet republics had the right to their own official language, education up to university level (not included necessarily but included in many times) in their official languages, and in all republics except possibly Belarus, the majority of printed books and magazines were printed in the regional language. During the Stalin era there were unjustifiable mistakes such as the deportations of Crimean Tatars or Koreans, but this was nothing out of the norm for societies of that age (this was 1930s, for reference France murdered 1+ million locals in colonial Algeria as late as 1960). Overall, the race policy was extremely inclusive, to the point that Stalin himself was Georgian, and Khrushchev and Brezhnev were Ukrainian.

      The USSR was extremely progressive for its time, let alone the fact that up to 1929 it was composed majorly of uneducated rural peasants who worked the lands with their own hands.

    • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Exactly this. Seems like a lot of people romanticizing communism never lived under it.

      In practice it is the other extreme compared to fascism.

    • RockBottom@feddit.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The symbolism is more a visual bait for people like you. I don’t think it means all lefties are stalinists. Many flags have stars and stripes, for example, the most meaningless crap anybody ever cared to put on a rag. So chill.

        • Wildmimic@anarchist.nexus
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          It’s making fun of people who see hammer and sickle and think only of left-authoritarians, whose methods are the same as those of any other authoritarian, regardless of their goals.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s NOT about URSS anymore, that symbol is the most famous symbol of communism, so it’s used that, but it’s NOT indicating the URSS

      • takeda@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        AFAIK the USSR was the first country to implement communism and it exported it to others. The hammer and sickle originates from them.

        So anyone romanticizing those symbols and claiming that this flavor of communism was open to different sexualities, genders, religions, races is extremely ignorant.

        It is liberalism that is accepting them, the communism that we had so far is just the other extreme compared to fascism.

        • Axolotl@feddit.it
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          7 hours ago

          It is liberalism that is accepting them

          Fake, Marxism never had these issues to begin with, simply no one implememted marxism, i wouldn’t even say that those other ideologies(stalinism etc etc) are communism but whatever