• Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    60
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    “They said, ‘Well, Saudi Arabia killed a journalist,’ and rest in peace, Jamal Khashoggi. I’m sorry that he got murdered in such a heinous fashion. And also, look, bro, Israel’s killed 240 journalists in the last three months, so I didn’t know y’all were still counting.”

    he does have one well-thought message, albeit with incorrect addressing and postage

    now that i look it up, he does already condemn israel much more than palestine (and gotten flak for it). he even called israel a war criminal back in oct 2023. i wonder how this hasn’t caused certain senators including MAGA to try and cancel him yet…

    • Wrufieotnak@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The correct and moral decision isn’t ‘I work for all murderous regimes’, it is ‘I work for no murderous regime’.

      Simple as that and he failed. And before somebody comes with ‘but what about USA/China/UK’ I said all. And there is also a big difference between working in a country and being invited by the rulers of the country.

    • Rothe@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Typical whataboutist deflection. He tries to hide the fact that he is a snivelling piece of shit.

      • MissJinx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        not really he is just showing the gigantic hypocrisy of some woke fighters.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      He’s a Muslim, I think it was safe to assume he’s not a fan of Israel BEFORE the current iteration of the genocide against Palestinians tbh.

      Though I don’t even remember his trans jokes being intentionally malicious or anything. More like… Just poor taste and then he doubled down on it.

      • ImADifferentBird@piefed.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        It hardly matters at this point. Even if it wasn’t malicious at first, it became malicious as soon as he doubled down, and tripled down, and quadrupled down…

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Not having heard the jokes under “discussion” here, I cannot comment on those specifically. But overall Chappelle’s message rings loud and clear (to me) that LGBTQIA+ people, at the end of the day, are still “passing”, whereas a black man in that part of the USA can never present as anything other than black, and that makes a HUGE difference.

      I’ll let him tell it in his own words though: https://youtube.com/shorts/hac3bwgo90g

      • mzesumzira@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        15 hours ago

        The point does not stands on its own, rainbow people absolutely can have a hard time “passing”, just ask the many gay kids bullied and harassed even when deep in the closet, without even mentioning trans folks.

        Even if blackout drunk I managed to forget that, though, “you are fine if you hide who you are” is still a shitty argument to endorse.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          A black trans person would absolutely have a hard time passing, but Dave’s point is that being open about one’s LGBTQIA+ status is a choice (arguably not much of one, except that people do it so… it CAN be put away, when someone is ready to “pass”).

          Mainly he’s saying that black people are people too, and should be considered as such. He has pointed out how unfair he considers the situation that when white gay men wanted marriage equality, a Supreme Court decision came something like 10 years after the major push started, with everyone in Hollywood backing that. Meanwhile, black people have been waiting for equal rights in the USA for 400+ years, and it’s like “when is it our turn?”

          It seems all too convenient for white men who are also gay or trans or whatever to call it quits when they get theirs, leaving POC behind in the dust, again.

          I find like many people judge him without ever even listening to his material, so of course cannot really understand it.