• laz@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This was true once, but not for a long time now. And that’s generally true across the board, at least in US, Canada, and most of Europe.

        • blarghly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          Idk, I got mine at 2.85%. Seems like a pretty good deal to me. Less than the rate of inflation, so the bank is essentially paying me to own a house

          • Agent641@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Counterpoint: The alternative is rent trap or homelessness

            Jerking off a homeless dude for free is a good deal when he has a gun in your neck.

            • blarghly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              What’s your point? We are always making choices between alternatives that are more or less appealing. I am drinking mediocre gas station coffee right now. The alternative is no coffee. Drinking the coffee is a good deal for me, because for me right now, mediocre coffee is better than no coffee.

            • blarghly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Sure, but you likely don’t have the cash to put down on a house you like. This is a pretty normal scenario if we look at human history. As soon as we invented cities, land in and around cities was expensive. It could take a lifetime to save up enough to buy a house. Hence a mortgage - the bank (which is mostly just the savings of other people around you) gives you the money right now to buy a house. Then you get to live in the house while you “save up” for it.