Context: PugJesus often spams low quality posts across the dozen or so communities they mod, apparently downvoting low effort spam on my frontpage is trolling. The only other action in the modlog is a different ban for 74 years for “Mass downvoting innocuous content,” so it definitely seems they are just banning people that dislike their spam. Glad we’re not missing out on the reddit mod experience here.

    • Skavau@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 days ago

      Not really. Hypothetical: If someone who doesn’t like metal music enters [email protected] and downvotes every post there - and commits themselves to doing it to every new post, this hurts their visibility across the Fediverse. Would you not say its reasonable, in this specific hypothetical, for the community owner to ban a user who does that?

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        that’s true but that’s a very specific hypothetical i’m not sure happens that much.

        • Skavau@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          9 days ago

          Well I’ll give you my own experience: When I was growing [email protected] before lemm.ee shut down, the community collected about 5 frequent downvoters. None of these accounts ever upvoted. They never participated by posting or commenting. In a few cases, two of the accounts had no posting history on the fediverse at all. They existed purely to downvote. Whether because they didn’t like television as a topic, or hated news articles being posted - I don’t know. But they would, between them, always downvote posts and sometimes do so early - deprecating their visibility.

          Since moving to piefed after lemm.ee shut down, I’ve only had to do it again twice.

          I think it’s reasonable for a community moderator to decide that these accounts are unwelcome and ban them.

          • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 days ago

            you are right, i don’t think that’s op’s case though. do you think these accounts you describe might be just bots instead?

            • Skavau@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              9 days ago

              Some of them did interact on the fediverse (although not on television). The ones with no posting/comment activity? No idea.

              The point is that people really do behave like this.