io@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agofor a better future for ur childrenpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square62fedilinkarrow-up1347arrow-down12file-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1345arrow-down1imagefor a better future for ur childrenpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneio@piefed.blahaj.zone to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 20 days agomessage-square62fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareUnfortunateShort@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11·20 days agoKilling is good way to reduce your CO2 footprint
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·20 days agoBombs are not environmentally friendly.
minus-squareRusty@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·20 days agoAverage person’s carbon footprint is 7 tons CO2 per year. Killing just one person will make a bomb environmentally friendly.
minus-squareOBJECTION!@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·20 days agoThat’s actually a statistical error, Carbon Bezos is an outlier who should not have been counted.
minus-squareEcho Dot@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up3·20 days agoBut it’s just as easy to blow up with a bomb. So it evens out.
Killing is good way to reduce your CO2 footprint
Bombs are not environmentally friendly.
Average person’s carbon footprint is 7 tons CO2 per year. Killing just one person will make a bomb environmentally friendly.
That’s actually a statistical error, Carbon Bezos is an outlier who should not have been counted.
But it’s just as easy to blow up with a bomb. So it evens out.
But what if we made them so? 🤔