I can’t believe people are actually debating this bullshit. How do you debate when you can literally just invent some concept out of thin air, and present it as what God intended? No data, no studies, no historical evidence, everybody just seems really confident in their own personal interpretation of what some - imaginary friend, superpowerful alien entity, invisible life force, whatever - wants from us…or else.
making the point that some imaginary friend tell other they should have right over you cause they dont belive in the imaginary friend when other dont. Compare thoses 2 as equal is missinformed or dishonest
You aren’t a very coherent writer, so I need some clarification. Are you saying that your right to force me to live by your imaginary religious rules, is more valid than my right to live free of your imaginary religious rules?
My rights are based on personal Liberty and Freedom, and you don’t have any right to restrict MY freedoms with YOUR imaginary religious beliefs. Live however ignorantly you want, but you have absolutely no right to impose that on me, nor must I respect it, especially when you are trying to force it on me.
I’m so sick of wildly delusional religious freaks thinking about they have some authority over the rest of us, and if we won’t accept it, they’ll force it on us for our own good, so their Imaginary Friend will be pleased with them.
That s litteraly what il trying to say. Not all religion believe the believer doesn’t have right regarding the non believer. I think it s an important distinction. I never pretend I have right regarding your freedom, contrary to other that will ressort to violence.
I can’t believe people are actually debating this bullshit. How do you debate when you can literally just invent some concept out of thin air, and present it as what God intended? No data, no studies, no historical evidence, everybody just seems really confident in their own personal interpretation of what some - imaginary friend, superpowerful alien entity, invisible life force, whatever - wants from us…or else.
making the point that some imaginary friend tell other they should have right over you cause they dont belive in the imaginary friend when other dont. Compare thoses 2 as equal is missinformed or dishonest
You aren’t a very coherent writer, so I need some clarification. Are you saying that your right to force me to live by your imaginary religious rules, is more valid than my right to live free of your imaginary religious rules?
My rights are based on personal Liberty and Freedom, and you don’t have any right to restrict MY freedoms with YOUR imaginary religious beliefs. Live however ignorantly you want, but you have absolutely no right to impose that on me, nor must I respect it, especially when you are trying to force it on me.
I’m so sick of wildly delusional religious freaks thinking about they have some authority over the rest of us, and if we won’t accept it, they’ll force it on us for our own good, so their Imaginary Friend will be pleased with them.
That s litteraly what il trying to say. Not all religion believe the believer doesn’t have right regarding the non believer. I think it s an important distinction. I never pretend I have right regarding your freedom, contrary to other that will ressort to violence.