Rapid Response 47 is another Trump white alt spewing racist shit

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 day ago

    LMAO

    Prove me wrong right here in this book, but umm ignore the first half of it, that the church definitely considers canon.

    Certainly you can do a better job trolling than that!

    • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      it s cannon but it doesnt hold the same weight. That s why i said that. I can explain to you what s the difference but we keep it simple. yet you can still proove me wrong u have a whole book for that

        • bigmamoth@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          it s cannon but it doesnt hold the same weight. That s why i said that. I can explain to you what s the difference but we keep it simple.

          good job not being abble to read

          • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 day ago

            Right, you effectively reworded your point without addressing anything or supporting your argument in the slightest. I wouldn’t talk shit about reading ability if I were in your shoes. And I’ll be nice and not get into the readability of the content of your post.

            That being said, just because you don’t hold it in the same regard as you do the new testament does not invalidate that your religion sees it as part of the holy Scripture, frequently references it in normal courses, and your profit specifically said he didn’t invalidate the previous covenant.

            Either way, the old testament is part of your Bible and holds much of the spiritual law used in the religion. Not accepting the barbarism of half your holy text as part of your religion is just pure fucking cope, and laughable as a reformed christian.

              • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                12 hours ago

                Read what I wrote again.

                I never said the barbarism is justified by the old testament, but it’s literally part of your religion and you can’t hand wave that away because you don’t like the shit the old testament does.

                  • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    12 hours ago

                    What part of Christianity is barbaric ?

                    Again, reread what I wrote, because you’re asking me to support a position I didn’t take.

                    Either way, the old testament is part of your Bible and holds much of the spiritual law used in the religion. Not accepting the barbarism of half your holy text as part of your religion is just pure fucking cope, and laughable as a reformed christian.

                    It’s called the old testament, the barbaric half of your book. Give it a read and you’ll see how barbaric it is in many places. I’m not going to read it and cite chapter and verse when you can’t even read a Lemmy comment.

                    Edit: but hell, let’s throw around concepts where your god acted barbaric: The Great Flood, Sodom and Gomorrah, the shit with Lot and his daughters, Abraham being told to kill his son, god hardening the pharaoh’s heart so he could kill all their livestock and first born… Like I could keep going on, it’s not hard to come up with tons of examples of the horrific shit your god does or has his followers do.