• Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I would say this is not universal. For some, the written word is the native “tongue”, conveying the actual, intended meaning. The written word allows the speaker the opportunity to evaluate and revise their language to match their intent, and the listener the opportunity to re-evaluate previously transmitted thoughts.

    The oral variant is dependent on the real-time aptitude of the speaker to articulate their thoughts and message, and for the listener to extract that meaning from the same. For those of us handicapped in these traits, the spoken word is the poor facsimile for actual (written) communication.

    • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      There are those constraints around written/spoken word, for sure. I’m more referring to how close it is to the “raw” thought.

      We evolved the ability to think. In order to allow our thoughts to reach others, we developed spoken word. In order to allow those spoken words to be passed through time, we developed written word. Each refers back to the previous “layer” of communication.

      Even someone who has a speech impediment, for instance, is still using the same written language as someone else in the same culture. And that written language was developed specifically to try and evoke the words someone in the culture speaks.