• OpenStars@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    This article never does fully explain why, only taking the issue one step further:

    Tolkien refers to Disney’s works as “vulgar.” Tolkien also believed that fairy tales had become hopelessly infantilized

    It seems just a matter of personal distaste?

    • pilferjinx@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Disney had a great whimsical vibe back in the early days. The old tales were usually fucking grim. Both have a place to exist.

      • OpenStars@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        That’s the thing: a story meant for little children isn’t the same type of enjoyment as a story meant for adults. They are different categories, so better to be judged within their own realms, not with a one-size-fits-all metric.

  • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    19 hours ago

    I suppose the first Hobbit film (1967, featuring Princess Mika, and the only adaptation he could have seen in his lifetime) didn’t change his mind about cartoons.

    It is basically a narrated slideshow completed just to fulfil the terms of a book rights contract. The producer had it cheaply and hastily drawn by one of my favorite artists/animators Adolf Born, known for his other work like Mach a Šebestová.
    Adolf Born Hentai Reference