The Soviet system used psychiatry as a weapon by diagnosing political opponents as mentally ill in order to confine them as patients instead of trying them in court. Anyone who challenged the state such as dissidents, writers, would-be emigrants, religious believers, or human rights activists could be branded with fabricated disorders like sluggish schizophrenia. This turned normal political disagreement into supposed medical pathology and allowed the state to present dissent as insanity.

Once labeled in this way, people were placed in psychiatric hospitals where they could be held for long periods without legal protections. Harsh treatments were often used to break their resolve. The collaboration between state security organs and compliant psychiatrists created a system where political imprisonment was disguised as medical care, letting the Soviet regime suppress opposition while pretending it was addressing illness rather than silencing critics.

  • RubberElectrons@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    No -ism is immune to hubris. I still believe in people sharing in the profit of their labor, and appreciate this post clarifying one of the many ways dissent can be crushed, albeit temporarily.

    If one’s idea is genuinely good, it better be able to handle dissent. Once gulags get involved, you’ve long ago lost the people’s belief, and are on a timer.

    Evil never perseveres. Never has, never will.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Evil never perseveres. Never has, never will.

      Huh? Have you not been paying attention for the last several decades?

    • Digit@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Amen for [real] democracy.

      Try be a dissident in democracy, and you’re just doing more democracy.