• inconel@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      Japanese law doesn’t consider font itself or the style to be copyrighted, but font files are considered “program” (it is very broad in jurisdictional sense, roughly translates to “digital data that produce products through computational process”, and displaying letters on monitor is applicable) and thus fall under under copyright protection.

  • WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    People complain about the evil of landlords, but it’s nothing compared to companies like this.

    Landlords at least nominally provide some sort of ongoing services. There are no necessary services a font company could possibly provide - there’s no maintenance, no upkeep, no ongoing costs at all. This is just pure, and purely evil, rent-seeking.

    • TehPers@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      59 minutes ago

      To be clear, there are some awful landlords out there. I agree with your point, but I don’t want to diminish the dislike of many landlords.

      • Miles O'Brien@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        38 minutes ago

        Landlords province nothing to society, they are leeches who profit off others hard work simply because they “own the property” the worker lives on and takes care of.

        Save a tree, axe a landlord.

        • TehPers@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          This is not true at all. Good landlords also take care of the property, providing what is functionally a “home as a service” with none of the hassle of maintaining it.

          There are bad landlords. Most rentals are owned by them. There are precious few that are not.

  • Megaman_EXE@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    4 hours ago

    So then it sounds like somebody just needs to provide a font for applications that is a low priced one time payment and they would do pretty well. I wonder how difficult it is

  • alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgOPM
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As reported by Gamemakers and GameSpark and translated by Automaton, Fontworks LETS discontinued its game licence plan at the end of November.

    The expensive replacement plan – offered through Fontwork’s parent company, Monotype – doesn’t even provide local pricing for Japanese developers, and comes with a 25,000 user-cap, which is likely not workable for Japan’s bigger studios.

    The problem is further compounded by the difficulties and complexities of securing fonts that can accurately transcribe Kanji and Katakana characters.