• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 minutes ago

      Better yet, let’s learn from the success of socialist countries and smash the capitalist state, replace it with a socialist one, and gradually collectivize production and distribution with a focus on meeting the needs of the people.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 minute ago

        Ok, but how do we get there? How do we keep oligarchs like the ones who own Palantir and work with oligarchs like Netenyahu to use remote weapons of mass genocide to fight and gain ground in order to control others, from taking advantage of the power vacuum left by destabilization?

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        21 minutes ago

        I don’t really get how that contradicts needing a 3rd reconstruction that dismantles the government agencies that carry out that kind of shit and didn’t even exist until WWII rather than dismantling a democracy?

        you guys are just upset it is happening at home now and not Iraq.

        Can’t argue with you there, but that’s also part of what makes me question who’s best interest would be dismantling U.S. democracy instead of dismantling specific agencies within the government, with no plan for where we go next?

        Because it kinda seems like those agencies would carry on doing whatever they want even after a union fully dissolves. They would just have fewer obstacles in their way.

        When you think about how an American agency, for example, the CIA operates this playbook in other countries, what is their intended goal?

        Their goal is to destabilize a country in order to remove any obstacles to taking full control. They usually achieve destabilization by undermining public trust in a system and the leaders of that system, so that the public will either dismantle the government for them or be less resistant once it is dismantled (see the Soviet Union in the late 80s). Once that happens, they already hold all the resources and power, and install somebody they already have lined up.

        Considering that there seems to currently be a global campaign to spread disinformation and install far right leaders across the globe, it makes me question if this is happening everywhere bc global destabilization is the goal.

        Currently, just about anywhere in the world, who holds the majority of the resources? The people or a small group of oligarchs? When destabilization happens and a local government collapses who has the upper hand when it comes to filling the power vacuum?

          • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 minutes ago

            Like which countries specifically? Bc I can almost guarantee there is currently a far right disinformation campaign targeted at undermining that country’s government.

        • I don’t really get how that contradicts needing a 3rd reconstruction that dismantles the government agencies that carry out that kind of shit and didn’t even exist until WWII rather than dismantling a democracy?

          1. You don’t have a democracy, you live in a dictatorship of capital
          2. You never completed the second reconstruction, what makes you think you can handle a third
          • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 minutes ago

            What makes you think oligarchs haven’t been continuing to undermine and dismantle the second reconstruction this entire time, and aren’t using their established global institutions (like banks and conservative think tanks) to do exactly what they’ve been projecting and accusing progressives of doing the entire time?

            Do you honestly think there isn’t a good chance a global kabal of conservatives might be ready to use the wealth and resources they hoard and pass down for generations to take full global control?