• Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    41 minutes ago

    I don’t really get how that contradicts needing a 3rd reconstruction that dismantles the government agencies that carry out that kind of shit and didn’t even exist until WWII rather than dismantling a democracy?

    you guys are just upset it is happening at home now and not Iraq.

    Can’t argue with you there, but that’s also part of what makes me question who’s best interest would be dismantling U.S. democracy instead of dismantling specific agencies within the government, with no plan for where we go next?

    Because it kinda seems like those agencies would carry on doing whatever they want even after a union fully dissolves. They would just have fewer obstacles in their way.

    When you think about how an American agency, for example, the CIA operates this playbook in other countries, what is their intended goal?

    Their goal is to destabilize a country in order to remove any obstacles to taking full control. They usually achieve destabilization by undermining public trust in a system and the leaders of that system, so that the public will either dismantle the government for them or be less resistant once it is dismantled (see the Soviet Union in the late 80s). Once that happens, they already hold all the resources and power, and install somebody they already have lined up.

    Considering that there seems to currently be a global campaign to spread disinformation and install far right leaders across the globe, it makes me question if this is happening everywhere bc global destabilization is the goal.

    Currently, just about anywhere in the world, who holds the majority of the resources? The people or a small group of oligarchs? When destabilization happens and a local government collapses who has the upper hand when it comes to filling the power vacuum?

    • I don’t really get how that contradicts needing a 3rd reconstruction that dismantles the government agencies that carry out that kind of shit and didn’t even exist until WWII rather than dismantling a democracy?

      1. You don’t have a democracy, you live in a dictatorship of capital
      2. You never completed the second reconstruction, what makes you think you can handle a third
      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        27 minutes ago

        What makes you think oligarchs haven’t been continuing to undermine and dismantle the second reconstruction this entire time, and aren’t using their established global institutions (like banks and conservative think tanks) to do exactly what they’ve been projecting and accusing progressives of doing the entire time?

        Do you honestly think there isn’t a good chance a global kabal of conservatives might be ready to use the wealth and resources they hoard and pass down for generations to take full global control?

      • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        No no no. In socialist countries, the Big Government is in control. There’s no freedom. Everyone lives in fear. You don’t even own your own toothbrush.

        Anyone who supports socialism is a Tankie who just wants to kill rich white people for fun and doesn’t understand how awful their lives will be afterwards.

      • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        23 minutes ago

        Like which countries specifically? Bc I can almost guarantee there is currently a far right disinformation campaign targeted at undermining that country’s government.

        • eldavi@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          12 minutes ago

          the disinformation campaign has been running since the mid 1930’s and it’s been taught in our schools and disseminated via legacy media since the 1940’s.

          a key feature of the campaign is to make americans predisposed to outright reject the alternatives that have already been proven to work in irl and all of those alternatives are aligned with what @[email protected] already told you.

          anything else is going to be a rinse and repeat of what we already have.

          • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 minutes ago

            a key feature of the campaign is to make americans predisposed to outright reject the alternatives that have already been proven to work

            Not just with socialism. This was the response to the civil rights movement of the 60s/70s, to the environmentalism of the 80s/90s, and to the anti-war movement of the 00s/10s.

            Every progressive position is pillared as unworkable, overly expensive, and jobs-killing.

            Meanwhile, we sink $1T/year into chat bots that spam your Twitter feed with racist porn and armies of tweaked out sheriffs deputies to crash their cars into anyone they consider illegally brown

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          18 minutes ago

          Cuba, the PRC, Vietnam, Laos, etc. There are far-right disinformation campaigns from western countries trying to undermine them, but these countries have sovereignty over their media, industry, and infrastructure, and thus show no signs of collapse. If the US Empire was overthrown, there’s no chance the EU could meaningfully overturn that, they are far too weak at this point, and couldn’t even overturn the soviets when Europe was stronger and right next door.