Italy’s parliament on Tuesday approved a law that introduces femicide into the country’s criminal law and punishes it with life in prison.

The vote coincided with the international day for the elimination of violence against women, a day designated by the U.N. General Assembly.

The law won bipartisan support from the center-right majority and the center-left opposition in the final vote in the Lower Chamber, passing with 237 votes in favor.

The law, backed by the conservative government of Premier Giorgia Meloni, comes in response to a series of killings and other violence targeting women in Italy. It includes stronger measures against gender-based crimes including stalking and revenge porn.

  • village604@adultswim.fan
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    So it’s only a hate crime if it happens to the gender that has a higher rate of being targeted?

    • ameancow@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This is typically how the legal system responds to increases in specific kinds of crimes, they adjust the system to more efficiently prosecute that crime.

      If you have a better idea for how to combat disproportionate crime statistics without targeting that specific kind of crime, from a legal standpoint, I’m sure the world would love to hear it.

      • village604@adultswim.fan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        How does making it a hate crime to kill men because of their gender take away from it being a hate crime to kill women because of their gender?

        Do you think killing a white person because of their race shouldn’t be a hate crime?

        • ameancow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          You’re viewing law and order as symmetrical, it’s not like that. Nothing is like that, broadly as a global civilization we respond to imbalanced factors in order to preserve balance the best we can.

          If an neighborhood is using more power than other neighborhoods, the power grid will be adjusted to compensate.

          If you drink more juice than milk and you don’t want to run out of juice, you adjust your buying habits to buy more juice.

          While some people probably have killed white people for their race, the problem here isn’t symmetrical, more white people have killed people of color for their race in most places than the reverse because of a complex historical context. The law, and all of society broadly, implements laws or other systems to balance imbalances. Hate crimes have been typically perpetuated by one group versus another. Gender-related crimes VASTLY dominate in one direction than the other, and I’m still not hearing a better solution for this fact from the standpoint of law and order.

          Does this idea make you feel bad? Seriously, I’m wondering why this is being challenged without an offer of a better idea or solution.

      • Saapas@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        8 hours ago

        If it happens for exact same reason I don’t see why one would be hate crime and the other not tbh