• Bombastion@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I agree that most anti-GMO stances are silly, but Cavendish bananas aren’t GMO. (The history of major banana cultivars is super interesting, though!)

      • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        but Cavendish bananas aren’t GMO

        They are. We took something barely edible in nature and bred it to the point where it’s a tasty treat. It’s a perfect example of GMO.

      • scholar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        Almost all food crops are GMO through the practice of selective breeding. Bananas have been altered to be sterile, seedless, and have larger edible fruit.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          Selective breeding isnt GMO tho. Gmo is modifying genetics directly. Selective breeding is manipulativing the natural processes and hoping the offspring carried the desired genes. Its like saying placing bets on a roulette table is investing.

          • scholar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            21 minutes ago

            Actually I’d say that investing is gambling, and selective breeding is a form of genetic engineering.

          • Alaknár@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Selective breeding isnt GMO tho

            It absolutely is.

            The definition of a genetically modified organism (GMO) is not clear and varies widely between countries, international bodies, and other communities. At its broadest, the definition of a GMO can include anything that has had its genes altered, including by nature. Taking a less broad view, it can encompass every organism that has had its genes altered by humans, which would include all crops and livestock

          • jacksilver@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I mean, the line between gambling and investing is a lot thinner than most people would like to believe.

      • taiyang@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 days ago

        Yes, but can us Pro-GMO get Gros Michels back into production? I’ll let Monsanto inject me with 5G Tylenol vaccines for the rebirth of those yellow fatties.