• Aeao@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Obligatory “technically correct, the best kind of correct”

    That’s how English works. It’s usage. I think the French have a council that decides but English moves a lot faster.

    I get having a pet peeve. I for one hate that ignorant means uneducated when it should be someone who is willfully ignoring. That’s just not the way it played out.

    I love dictionaries and word usage. “Healthful” is a clunky word, I’m not surprised we moved to “healthy “

    Edit: I just realized “helpful” sounds just fine. But if someone said to me “thanks for being so helpy today” I would be a full of seething hatred lol

    • samus12345@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      “Healthy” has always been an actual word, while “helpy” hasn’t, so no wonder it’s grating!

      I’m all for language changing when it makes sense. I can’t think of any situation where using “healthy” instead of “healthful” obfuscates the meaning in any way. Same with “who” and “whom.” “Whom” and “healthful” could disappear and nothing of value would be lost. But when it comes to things like “literally” meaning “figuratively,” I mourn the loss of utility the word used to have.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Oh and it literally worries me when people use one word to mean the exact opposite. That isn’t advancement it’s degradation.

        And ten points to grifendor for the word “obfuscate “ it’s one of my favorites.

        Sorry for the tripple reply. This is one of the things I get excited about.

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        Omg I just realized my money concept also applies to sex.

        “My wife and I were slapping the banker last night, she got to keep the change”

      • Aeao@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Knock knock

        Who’s there

        To

        To who?

        It’s to whom actually.

        Yes as long as what you’re saying makes sense that’s all that matters. Language is just the sound you make to communicate the idea in your head to someone else.

        The opposite tho is names. I’m Michael. Not Mike. It doesn’t offended me to be called Mike but that’s not the sound your face needs to make to get my attention. It’s a different sound.

        But for just talking… “I stop speak right but you can hold it, then where’s the rub?”

        I actually would play around by calling “money” different things. See how weird I could get. “Bucks” fine. Doodlyfranks? In context it works just fine. You can call money anything. Since fallout I regularly say “I’m short on caps” no one’s ever questioned it.

          • Aeao@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 hour ago

            Excellent example of how names work. It’s not about if I’m annoyed or not. If you want to get my attention you have to flap your meat together and blow air thru it this way (the meat people story if you haven’t heard that. It’s great)

            I reply with classical works of the philosopher Monty python

            “Is you wife a goer, know what I mean, I bet she does I bet she does”

            Language has always fascinated me. Clown too. Not party but the ones who don’t talk but communicate ideas thru body language and face make up. Yes the makeup serves a practical communicative purpose.