• Devial@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      There’s already a solution for that. It’s called premium economy/business class.

      And if you’re gonna say “but that’s so much more expensive”, well guess what’s going to happen if you reduce how many pax can fit on an aircraft.

    • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Actually, I prefer the tight packing. I wanna get from A to B, and have you seen how expensive tickets are?

      They should really be using wide body flying/blended wings so the cabin is more spacious for the same max payload, but that’s a separate matter.


      That being said, I think airlines should mix in a few spacier seats, for big/tall people, for a small, markup, and exclude all the business class extras.

  • ccunning@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I feel like this is a fairly common opinion. Also, I believe they do have to after some point; not sure how the airline decides though?

    • over_clox@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      It’s got to do with calculating the amount of fuel for the plane. More weight requires more fuel.

      Edit: I’m sure it’s also partly exaggerated capitalism, the companies want every dollar they can milk from the passengers…

      • Devial@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 hour ago

        No it isn’t. Not in large airplanes. The typical takeoff weight of an A320 is in the neighborhood of 50-70 tons. The pilots do not give a shit if a few passengers weigh a couple 100kg more than the average, and that’s a narrow body. A couple PAX being grosly obese on a widebody, with typical takeoff weights in excess of 100 tons, is even more negligible.

        Fuel calculations and weight&balance is calculated based on assumed average weights for men, women and children, generally something in the neighborhood of 85kg for men, 75 for women and 30-40 for children (includes assumed average hand luggage weight as well)

        • over_clox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          You’re using actual reasoning, while dismissing my edit of corporate greed reasoning. You better believe, especially in capitalist USA, they’d just as soon charge you $10 a fart if they could…

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        I mean, mass is a massive factor for flight.

        If you ever fly on a small plane, they ask your weight, and cap your luggage weight because they absolutely have to.

  • Scott@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’m tall and don’t fit in any seat other than an exit row. If there aren’t any exit rows should I be forced to pay for the seat in front of me?

    • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      I mean, look at it from the passenger in front’s perspective. They’re paying as much for their seat as everyone else presumably, and yet if you’re too tall to fit in your seat and your knees are pressed up against theirs for the whole flight, they’re having a considerably worse experience than everyone else. Should they have to pay as much as everyone else does, with that in mind?