• halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    61
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Pearson is a testing company. They use all sorts of sketchy shit under the guise of anti-cheating. Much of that requires specific plug-ins and stuff that only work in Windows.

    Even if you could get it working, but they’ll likely just say you were cheating, and take the $300+ you paid to take that required test.

    • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      Pearson using all sorts of extremely invasive and questionable kernel-level access plugins to make sure people don’t open notes to cheat on their test on their computer. People just open their notes on another device. Or, you know, paper.

      • DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Or, you know, paper.

        • That’s what desk/workspace scanning in the most extreme cases is meant to detect. This is why I really don’t like online schooling, because in the absolute worst case, your school will literally scan your place.

        You know what would be a really good way to show if your students learned your course material? Let them show it with a practical test of some kind…

        • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          28 minutes ago

          Thats not necessary for online teaching. I just got my degree and there were some online courses too, never had to deal with any of this anti cheating crap.

        • Treczoks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          3 hours ago

          My daughter had to write a university paper once. They required two cameras to be running. One atop the screen like you use for meetings, and one showing the whole desk and the tested person.

          • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            Redhat would randomly interrupt your test and ask you to stand up, pick up the camera and show the room

            • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              47 minutes ago

              It’s really useless too. If I wanted to cheat on a test so fucking bad, I’d learn to read braille and just stick reference material under my desk.

            • PrimeMinisterKeyes@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              edit-2
              1 hour ago

              Privacy invasion. I doubt that would hold water in the EU.
              Also, do we really want to normalize mandatory cameras broadcasting from people’s homes? Where’s the outrage?

                • Flax@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  16 minutes ago

                  In the UK I refused to turn my camera on in online class and cited GDPR. The next class the lecturer informed us that he can’t force us to do it anymore due to GDPR. Lol.

    • sorghum@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      8 hours ago

      The only solution for that is to proctor exams in person on their equipment. Miss me with all that nonsense. Makes me glad I’m done with schoolin’ for now…

      • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Oh Pearson definitely does thst as well. But not everyone lives near or has reliable transit to a testing facility. Online testing is essentially a requirement for those people.

    • Rooty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Linux will never become relevant on the desktop until its has better spyware support.