• LoveCanada@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    But as a thought experiment: AI images are usually derivative, even faces dont look exactly like the original, they take it and alter it a bit. So if someone takes an image and alters it, and then displays it publicly is it AI generated porn or is it art? Because obviously not all nudes are porn and some erotic art is still art. So a lawyer would have to prove that a) the original person is recognizable enough and therefore an offense has been committed and b) that the image is pornographic and not erotic art. That could be one heck of a challenge.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      I was going to agree with him but you have a good point. The source should not be real people . The person should have to put in prompts to get something that looks similar like hair color or whatnot. If they can’t get it just the way they want it than boo hoo.

    • Corridor8031@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      i mean in principle i dont even think people should be allowed to bully me with even a drawing of me publicly

      (i do think that the rules for ‘public’ figures and non should be different in this case tho)