• BarqsHasBite@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    2 days ago

    You’re twisting yourself into knots. I’m just informing protest-non-voters what they voted for.

    • Sal@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      36
      ·
      2 days ago

      “You should’ve just voted for genocide!!” is what you’re saying here. Also, there’s more than enough evidence to say the muskrat rigged the election, so even without the protest votes you’d still have won.

      • Rothe@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        Trump was a vote for 10x the genocide, besides all the other fascist stuff he has been doing.

        • Sal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Again, the election was rigged, so no, it’s not the fault of anyone who didn’t want to vote for a non-solution.

      • biggeoff@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Who is “you” in the phrase “you’d still have one”. Pretty obvious the person you’re arguing with isn’t a trump voter

        • Pat_Riot@lemmy.today
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          But the one you just replied to sure sounds like they voted for Trump by proxy.

        • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          Pretty obvious the person you’re arguing with isn’t a trump voter

          Is that really obvious though? It reads like a troll trying to create pointless division among progressives.

          I always read these people as either political bots or children (or adults, similarly intelligent) spreading a meme created by a political bot.

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              1 day ago

              Textbook DARVO sequencing.

              (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DARVO)

              On top of that, hypersensitivity, projection, victim-role adoption, blame pre-loading.

              While these are effective rhetorical tools for manipulating people, this isn’t how reasonable people engage in conversation.

              If you’re not a bot then you’re a narcissist or have picked up narcissistic behaviors from reading social media arguments and should, as the kids say, touch grass.

          • biggeoff@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            In fairness I can’t tell now. Good point. I would also dig at people not voting in protest and then complaining about trump being in power, but that is a straw man in isolation and I’ve not specifically come across someone with that opinion

            • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              Yes, exactly. They use a lot of bad faith arguments, logical fallacies, etc. They’re all just literary devices to amp up the messaging and they all follow roughly the same kind of bad faith argument templates.

              Of course, these could be people. The problem is that they seem to simultaneously be completely ignorant of how reality works while also being an encyclopedia of pop culture political references and grievances. If it’s a person then it fits the ‘chronically online, touch grass please’ stereotype, but there are so many others that argue exactly how it does on the exact same topics across all of social media so I just assume it is a bot or a bot-affected person.

              We know there are information operations that exist to shape public perception that are happening on all social media. This is what it looks like, very hard to tell apart from real people (made even harder by real people mimicking them).

      • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        “You should’ve just voted for genocide!!” is what you’re saying here.

        And by refusing to participate they allowed an even worse person to take the helm, and buddy up to Bibi (further than he already was) so he can build another tacky “luxury” resort on the rubble of those genocide victims homes.

        Bravo… 🙄

        • Sal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Or maybe the Dems should’ve actually done something to prevent it from continuing. So yeah, which is it? Are leftist non-votes important enough that those people should’ve voted, or are we so unimportant that appealing to the non-existant “moderate republican” and campaigning with literal war criminals was the actual good choice to win?

          I DID tell people to vote for Kamala, btw. That doesn’t mean I didn’t make fun of her for abandoning us for the favor of Dick Cheney and nevertrumpers. Who still voted for Trump, btw. And that’s not even taking into account the fact the election might have been actually rigged.