…then they are either gullible, desperate, or bad with money.
If anything I would think those would be indicators you wouldn’t want to have that person employed.
It would also be the opposite indicator of high agency. Someone of high agency would know they are their own person with their own power to affect change and wouldn’t simply hand over $500 for no reason.
…then they are either gullible, desperate, or bad with money.
If anything I would think those would be indicators you wouldn’t want to have that person employed.
It would also be the opposite indicator of high agency. Someone of high agency would know they are their own person with their own power to affect change and wouldn’t simply hand over $500 for no reason.
There is some irony in calling the A Players gullible in a tweet by “inhuman resources”
This community isn’t usually for satire accounts, so I guess I ate the onion on that one.