• A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    What more can I say but… Neat?

    Does beg the question on how radically changed computing would be today if it was released as a CPU when it first was developed.

    • CovfefeKills@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      Just because it exists does not mean it is commercially viable and would have been available. Stuff in labs and produced on small scales can absolutely be 30+ years ahead of commercially viable products. Take for example a quantum computer it is atleast 30 years ahead of something that would be viable to sell to someone to put in their living room. Quantum computing is maybe a really good example because the current science is disappointing but investment is going up implying ‘secret physics’.

      • mirshafie@europe.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Things can be commercially viable apart from thd general consumer market though. Hospitals, banks, manufacturing plants, research institutions et.c. might put up money that no one else could for niche gear.