• misk@piefed.socialOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Not that I disagree but in reality:

    • You can’t change rules retroactively in most places (ex post facto law)
    • If you were to ignore the above then all the scolding of countries like Hungary or Poland about the rule of law becomes harder to justify
    • EU countries might not want to destroy their credibility as a stable place to hold your money

    EU has to set up some kind of international crimes tribunal where a case against Russia is won and reparations are granted to Ukraine first at very least.

    • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      You can’t change rules retroactively in most places

      well the war is ongoing so they wouldn’t be retroactive… the cause for the change might have been some past behaviour, but that’s the case with most laws: you see a problem, make a law, the law applies to future behaviour

      EU countries might not want to destroy their credibility as a stable place to hold your money

      i think they’ve well and truly proven that unless you’re going to spend years waging war on an EU candidate country then you’ll be fine… and i think it’s wild that russia didn’t pull assets out of the US and EU before the war started… that shouldn’t be an expectation: that your assets are safe even when you commit war crimes? no! your assets shouldn’t be safe anywhere in the world for war criminals and people that are working against the interests of those countries

      • misk@piefed.socialOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        well the war is ongoing so they wouldn’t be retroactive… the cause for the change might have been some past behaviour, but that’s the case with most laws: you see a problem, make a law, the law applies to future behaviour

        I’m sure Russia didn’t place any new funds in EC custody since their existing ones were frozen. What are the laws that Russia was found guilty of? Please remember that in civilised countries you’re not guilty until independent court decides that and you have a chance to appeal, even when the case is blatantly obvious.

        i think they’ve well and truly proven that unless you’re going to spend years waging war on an EU candidate country then you’ll be fine… and i think it’s wild that russia didn’t pull assets out of the US and EU before the war started… that shouldn’t be an expectation: that your assets are safe even when you commit war crimes? no! your assets shouldn’t be safe anywhere in the world for war criminals and people that are working against the interests of those countries

        Those countries are part of EU and have voting rights. Do you mean we now ignore that too?

      • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 days ago

        What trust? You can trust us with your money, unless you plan on attacking Europe is IMO the correct message to send.

        Hell, I’d add it as a law: in case of being the aggressor in a war, all your assets will be used to help with reparations.

        • misk@piefed.socialOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          5 days ago

          What is Europe though? Ukraine isn’t a part of EU, NATO or even EEA so borders of that European empire we’re protecting become kind of arbitrary.

          • Sepia@mander.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            5 days ago

            Ukraine is part of Europe.

            That aside, Russia is violating not only human rights and the rule of law with its illegal invasion, it has also broken some 400 treaties since the invasion began in 2014 (that’s basically all treaties the Kremlin has signed).

            More importantly, though, Putin has been signing several decrees since 2022 allowing the seizure of Western assets, entangling firms ranging from Germany’s Uniper to Danish brewer Carlsberg.

            And Europe is not an “Empire.” Protecting Ukraine means protecting Europe as Russia will not stop here but rather aiming to attack the next country.

            • misk@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              5 days ago

              Ukraine is part of Europe.

              And Europe is not an “Empire.” Protecting Ukraine means protecting Europe as Russia will not stop here but rather aiming to attack the next country.

              That’s a rhetoric of spheres of influence and I don’t want EU to go there. It’s in our best interest to help out Ukraine so that we’re not flooded with millions more of refugees and because independent Ukraine is better for trade. Given the current political climate it’s best to stick to cold business facts rather than ideals - it’s easier to sell to general public.

              More importantly, though, Putin has been signing several decrees since 2022 allowing the seizure of Western assets, entangling firms ranging from Germany’s Uniper to Danish brewer Carlsberg.

              Euroclear is not responsible for that.

          • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 days ago

            Europe is a continent which Ukraine is part of. Border of Europe is pretty well defined, though I’m very open to redrawing the borders so that Russia isn’t even partially part of Europe.

            • misk@piefed.socialOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 days ago

              You’re back to sphere of influence talk, that’s something Russia does but we shouldn’t.

              • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                5 days ago

                I believe that being nice to people who want to hurt you is stupid. Call it whatever you want, if you attack Europe, you’re disturbing our peace and that should come with serious repercussions.

                • misk@piefed.socialOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 days ago

                  It has nothing to do with being nice, more with being consistent about own beliefs. If EU/NATO gets to draw arbitrary borders of spheres of influence (and Europe as a continent is arbitrary) then Russia gets to pretend to be anti imperialist (especially to global south who aren’t emotionally invested) with pretty strong arguments that you are giving them right now.

                  • Rikudou_Sage@lemmings.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 days ago

                    They pretend anyway, so what’s your point? I simply don’t want them in Europe, is that so hard to understand? My country has been occupied by them for decades, so no thank you.